Connect with us

Business

Dow Jones, S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite: Equities face a US bond brick wall

Dow Jones, S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite: Equities face a US bond brick wall
Successful of hand trader trading stock exchange graph money, global economic, trader investor,graph money of block chain stock market cryptocurrency selling and buy with price chart data graph istock photo for BL

The ‘elephant in the room’ here is the US government’s massive debt pile of .2 trillion. The country has been on a spending spree since the global financial crisis, which accelerated when the Covid pandemic hit.The week before last, US 10-year bonds witnessed the worst week since 2001, with yields spiking 50 basis points over the week to 4.5 per cent. Though yields cooled over the week gone by, a new drama surfaced with a brewing feud between President Trump and Fed Chair Powell.First is the refinancing problem. The previous administration ducked the interest rate pressure by issuing short-term bills instead of long-term bonds. While the approach was unsustainable for long, it’s the current administration’s problem to now refinance them with long-term bonds and will add further pressure on yields.

While the Trump administration is determined to bring yields on long-term bonds down, the Fed’s preference to wait and watch given tariff-led upside risks to inflation is playing a brick wall. Last week, Trump said he couldn’t wait to have Powell’s office terminated, while at the same time Powell’s chairmanship is legally well-guarded. The deadlock is a classic case of when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object.

Three factors

Published on April 19, 2025 Decades earlier, Richard Nixon’s Treasury Secretary famously said: “the dollar is our currency, but it’s your problem”.The debt-related problems for Trump administration stem from three factors.Today, the US’ debt to GDP stands at a significant 122 per cent (December 2024). Bond yields shooting up can burn a hole through the Federal Government’s finances, thus explaining Trump and his administration’s fixation on bond yields. In fact, it was the bond tantrum from the earlier week that pushed Trump to swiftly go slow on reciprocal tariffs.

US debt, an equity woe

The third factor is one that is self-inflicted. The policy of the Trump administration, going back and forth, attempts to upend global supply chains and could tarnish the safe-haven status of US Treasury securities and the global reserve currency status of the dollar. This is where trade war blows up into capital wars. Although there is no strong alternative to the US dollar yet, global central banks might turn to other currencies or gold even more. A week ago, speculations were rife in the bond market that China could retaliate by dumping its holdings of US bonds. This was one of the key reasons for the yield to go up the week before last, although the exact reason for the tantrum is still being investigated.Top investment bankers have forecast a 50 per cent/60 per cent probability of a recession. In a globalised economic environment, this means a slowdown in global GDP. This combined with high US bond yields, used as benchmark to price risk assets across the globe, can be a double whammy for equity investors.Investors across the world, including in India, must keep an eye on the US bond market.Two, is the issue of the US government’s addiction to spending, which of course Trump is trying to address with DOGE. While the US fiscal deficit cooled to 5.5 per cent of GDP in 2022 (calendar year) after having skyrocketed to 15.7 per cent of GDP in 2020 due to Covid stimulus, the ratio has now inched back to 6.8 per cent. Even worse, interest outlay of the Federal Government for 2024 surpassed the national defence outlay for the first time in the nation’s history. This reminds of Ferguson’s law – ‘any great power that spends more on debt servicing than on defence, risks ceasing to be a great power’.Similarly, this debt pile of the US and high yields are not only a problem for the US, but one for equity investors across the globe. First, the policies that the Trump administration is trying to implement could result in a stagflation in the US, a period of recession driven by inflated prices.

Published

on

Dow Jones, S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite: Equities face a US bond brick wall

Dow Jones, S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite: Equities face a US bond brick wall
The debt-related problems for Trump administration stem from three factors.
Two, is the issue of the US government’s addiction to spending, which of course Trump is trying to address with DOGE. While the US fiscal deficit cooled to 5.5 per cent of GDP in 2022 (calendar year) after having skyrocketed to 15.7 per cent of GDP in 2020 due to Covid stimulus, the ratio has now inched back to 6.8 per cent. Even worse, interest outlay of the Federal Government for 2024 surpassed the national defence outlay for the first time in the nation’s history. This reminds of Ferguson’s law – ‘any great power that spends more on debt servicing than on defence, risks ceasing to be a great power’.The ‘elephant in the room’ here is the US government’s massive debt pile of .2 trillion. The country has been on a spending spree since the global financial crisis, which accelerated when the Covid pandemic hit.Published on April 19, 2025

Successful of hand trader trading stock exchange graph money, global economic, trader investor,graph money of block chain stock market cryptocurrency selling and buy with price chart data graph istock photo for BL

First is the refinancing problem. The previous administration ducked the interest rate pressure by issuing short-term bills instead of long-term bonds. While the approach was unsustainable for long, it’s the current administration’s problem to now refinance them with long-term bonds and will add further pressure on yields.The third factor is one that is self-inflicted. The policy of the Trump administration, going back and forth, attempts to upend global supply chains and could tarnish the safe-haven status of US Treasury securities and the global reserve currency status of the dollar. This is where trade war blows up into capital wars. Although there is no strong alternative to the US dollar yet, global central banks might turn to other currencies or gold even more. A week ago, speculations were rife in the bond market that China could retaliate by dumping its holdings of US bonds. This was one of the key reasons for the yield to go up the week before last, although the exact reason for the tantrum is still being investigated.While the Trump administration is determined to bring yields on long-term bonds down, the Fed’s preference to wait and watch given tariff-led upside risks to inflation is playing a brick wall. Last week, Trump said he couldn’t wait to have Powell’s office terminated, while at the same time Powell’s chairmanship is legally well-guarded. The deadlock is a classic case of when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object.Decades earlier, Richard Nixon’s Treasury Secretary famously said: “the dollar is our currency, but it’s your problem”.

US debt, an equity woe

The week before last, US 10-year bonds witnessed the worst week since 2001, with yields spiking 50 basis points over the week to 4.5 per cent. Though yields cooled over the week gone by, a new drama surfaced with a brewing feud between President Trump and Fed Chair Powell.Today, the US’ debt to GDP stands at a significant 122 per cent (December 2024). Bond yields shooting up can burn a hole through the Federal Government’s finances, thus explaining Trump and his administration’s fixation on bond yields. In fact, it was the bond tantrum from the earlier week that pushed Trump to swiftly go slow on reciprocal tariffs.Similarly, this debt pile of the US and high yields are not only a problem for the US, but one for equity investors across the globe. First, the policies that the Trump administration is trying to implement could result in a stagflation in the US, a period of recession driven by inflated prices.Investors across the world, including in India, must keep an eye on the US bond market.Top investment bankers have forecast a 50 per cent/60 per cent probability of a recession. In a globalised economic environment, this means a slowdown in global GDP. This combined with high US bond yields, used as benchmark to price risk assets across the globe, can be a double whammy for equity investors.

Business

United Spirits Q4 PAT rises 17% to ₹451 cr for Q4FY25

United Spirits Q4 PAT rises 17% to ₹451 cr for Q4FY25
Within categories, the Prestige & Above segment grew 13.2 per cent, and the NSV for the Popular segment grew 1.1 per cent, said the company.
The growth was driven by the company’s re-entry into the Andhra Pradesh market and the resilient performance of its key trademarks, according to the company.The company’s Net Sales Value (NSV) for the quarter stood at ₹2,946 crore, up 10.5 per cent YoY. It’s gross revenue exceeded last year’s ₹6,394 crore to stand at ₹6,549 crore. Published on May 20, 2025 Shares of the company closed at ₹1,557.45, up 0.022 per cent on Tuesday on the BSE.Commenting on the result, Praveen Someshwar, CEO & Managing Director, said “The challenging demand environment notwithstanding, we have delivered 13.2 per cent NSV growth for P&A in Q4FY25 and 9.9 per cent P&A growth for FY25, and a leveraged EBITDA growth that takes us to our medium-term guidance.”Diageo India (United Spirits Ltd), a subsidiary of the British liquor giant Diageo reported a 17 per cent year-on-year increase in its standalone profit after tax (PAT) to ₹451 crore for the fourth quarter of FY25, compared to Q4 of the previous fiscal. The growth was driven by the company’s re-entry into the Andhra Pradesh market and the resilient performance of its key trademarks

For the full year FY25, it reported a PAT of ₹1,158 crore, up from last fiscal’s ₹1,312 crore.

Published

on

United Spirits Q4 PAT rises 17% to ₹451 cr for Q4FY25

United Spirits Q4 PAT rises 17% to ₹451 cr for Q4FY25
The company’s Net Sales Value (NSV) for the quarter stood at ₹2,946 crore, up 10.5 per cent YoY. It’s gross revenue exceeded last year’s ₹6,394 crore to stand at ₹6,549 crore.
For the full year FY25, it reported a PAT of ₹1,158 crore, up from last fiscal’s ₹1,312 crore. Within categories, the Prestige & Above segment grew 13.2 per cent, and the NSV for the Popular segment grew 1.1 per cent, said the company.The growth was driven by the company’s re-entry into the Andhra Pradesh market and the resilient performance of its key trademarks, according to the company.Shares of the company closed at ₹1,557.45, up 0.022 per cent on Tuesday on the BSE.Commenting on the result, Praveen Someshwar, CEO & Managing Director, said “The challenging demand environment notwithstanding, we have delivered 13.2 per cent NSV growth for P&A in Q4FY25 and 9.9 per cent P&A growth for FY25, and a leveraged EBITDA growth that takes us to our medium-term guidance.”Diageo India (United Spirits Ltd), a subsidiary of the British liquor giant Diageo reported a 17 per cent year-on-year increase in its standalone profit after tax (PAT) to ₹451 crore for the fourth quarter of FY25, compared to Q4 of the previous fiscal. The growth was driven by the company’s re-entry into the Andhra Pradesh market and the resilient performance of its key trademarks

Published on May 20, 2025

Continue Reading

Business

DLF Q4 net profit rises 37% to ₹1,268 cr; FY25 profit surges 59%

DLF Q4 net profit rises 37% to ₹1,268 cr; FY25 profit surges 59%
The other big-ticket launch, DLF Privana West, witnessed a complete sellout within a few days of the soft launch, clocking approximately ₹5,600 crore of new sales bookings.
“The Dahlias, received encouraging demand and generated ₹13,744 crore in new sales bookings during the fiscal. This has resulted in the monetization of approximately 39 percent of the estimated total sales potential of this project within the first year of its launch,” the company said in a statement. The country’s largest realtor, DLF, reported a net profit of ₹1,268 crore, up 37 per cent y-o-y, for the quarter ending March 31, 2025. Revenue (consolidated) for the period stood at ₹3,348 crore.DLF’s annuity business, DLF Cyber City Developers Limited (DCCDL), stood at ₹6,448 crore; EBITDA stood at ₹4,949 crore, reflecting a y-o-y growth of 11%; consolidated profit for the year stood at ₹2,461 crore, a y-o-y growth of 46%.DLF ended FY25 with a net cash surplus of ₹5,302 crore and improved its net cash position to ₹6,848 crore. 

“The Board has recommended a dividend of ₹6 per share for shareholders’ approval. This payout would signify a year-on-year growth of 20% in the dividend compared to the previous year,” the company said in a statement.For the full year, the company’s net profit stood at ₹4,357 crore, up 59 per cent y-o-y; while revenues (consolidated) stood at Rs 8996 crore. Revenue was driven by new sales bookings of ₹21,223 crore, up 44 per cent y-o-y.Published on May 19, 2025 The company generated a net cash surplus of ₹5,302 crore during the fiscal year, and its net cash position improved to ₹6,848 crore for FY25.

Published

on

DLF Q4 net profit rises 37% to ₹1,268 cr; FY25 profit surges 59%

DLF Q4 net profit rises 37% to ₹1,268 cr; FY25 profit surges 59%
DLF ended FY25 with a net cash surplus of ₹5,302 crore and improved its net cash position to ₹6,848 crore. 

DLF’s annuity business, DLF Cyber City Developers Limited (DCCDL), stood at ₹6,448 crore; EBITDA stood at ₹4,949 crore, reflecting a y-o-y growth of 11%; consolidated profit for the year stood at ₹2,461 crore, a y-o-y growth of 46%.Published on May 19, 2025 The company generated a net cash surplus of ₹5,302 crore during the fiscal year, and its net cash position improved to ₹6,848 crore for FY25.“The Board has recommended a dividend of ₹6 per share for shareholders’ approval. This payout would signify a year-on-year growth of 20% in the dividend compared to the previous year,” the company said in a statement.For the full year, the company’s net profit stood at ₹4,357 crore, up 59 per cent y-o-y; while revenues (consolidated) stood at Rs 8996 crore. Revenue was driven by new sales bookings of ₹21,223 crore, up 44 per cent y-o-y.The other big-ticket launch, DLF Privana West, witnessed a complete sellout within a few days of the soft launch, clocking approximately ₹5,600 crore of new sales bookings.“The Dahlias, received encouraging demand and generated ₹13,744 crore in new sales bookings during the fiscal. This has resulted in the monetization of approximately 39 percent of the estimated total sales potential of this project within the first year of its launch,” the company said in a statement. The country’s largest realtor, DLF, reported a net profit of ₹1,268 crore, up 37 per cent y-o-y, for the quarter ending March 31, 2025. Revenue (consolidated) for the period stood at ₹3,348 crore.

Continue Reading

Business

Editorial. Pressure tactics

Editorial. Pressure tactics
In a move that perhaps marks a shift in the way India is approaching trade talks with the US, the External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has firmly refuted the US’ claim, made repeatedly in recent weeks, that India has agreed to nil tariffs on US imports. Jaishankar’s statement last week tersely and firmly clarifies that trade talks are in progress, and ‘nothing is decided until everything is decided’. India has cleared the air, and it was high time that it did so. It coincides with the upcoming trade talks between the two countries this week; Commerce and Industries Minister Piyush Goyal is in the US with his team of negotiators.
There is scope to bring down tariffs in products which are zero-rated with other FTAs. A deal that brings down tariffs on India’s goods to 10 per cent is possible without much sacrifice. But Trump’s bluff and bluster must be called out, whether it is over trade or matters of national security, even as we keep our ties with US on an even keel. Published on May 18, 2025 External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar

Since April 8, when President Trump slapped his reciprocal tariffs on 57 countries with a 90-day deadline for them to take effect, his administration has gone overboard in ramping up the pressure on India. The gambit here is crudely simple — to force India to ink a deal in these 90 days, before July 8, in order to escape the 26 per cent tariffs that are expected to kick in after that. The same trick is being played out with the rest of the world as well, forcing quite a few countries to line up for talks with the US. In India’s case, Trump and his colleagues have cynically generated a lot of confusion. India has maintained a studied silence in the face of zero tariff claims. Its reticence was perhaps aimed at ensuring that the talks proceeded in good faith. But US’ actions have marred the process. Trump has proposed a ‘big beautiful Bill’ that may ‘tax’ 5 per cent of billion NRI remittance outflows. India should be circumspect in the face of pressure, without allowing the US to set the pace in the talks. A bad deal cobbled in haste is far worse than none at all. Meanwhile, India sent out another sharp message that it will look out for its interests. In a throwback to Trump 1.0, India has proposed retaliatory action on US’ tariffs on steel and aluminium. However, it needs to work out a plan with respect to other areas as well. At the outset, it should be clear that the US’ interests in India go beyond trade per se to persuading India to alter its regulatory systems with respect to GM food, e-commerce, big tech, pharma and other high tech sectors. It is also keen on access to India’s food (maize and soyabean) and dairy sector, besides selling defence equipment and oil. India has enough in its toolkit to squeeze a deal that does not hurt its interests. A levy on e-commerce monopolies, a cap on royalty payments, applying data localisation rules and compulsory licensing of patented drugs can be used to ward off an adverse outcome.

Published

on

Editorial. Pressure tactics

Editorial. Pressure tactics
Published on May 18, 2025
Since April 8, when President Trump slapped his reciprocal tariffs on 57 countries with a 90-day deadline for them to take effect, his administration has gone overboard in ramping up the pressure on India. The gambit here is crudely simple — to force India to ink a deal in these 90 days, before July 8, in order to escape the 26 per cent tariffs that are expected to kick in after that. The same trick is being played out with the rest of the world as well, forcing quite a few countries to line up for talks with the US. In India’s case, Trump and his colleagues have cynically generated a lot of confusion. India has maintained a studied silence in the face of zero tariff claims. Its reticence was perhaps aimed at ensuring that the talks proceeded in good faith. But US’ actions have marred the process. Trump has proposed a ‘big beautiful Bill’ that may ‘tax’ 5 per cent of billion NRI remittance outflows. India should be circumspect in the face of pressure, without allowing the US to set the pace in the talks. A bad deal cobbled in haste is far worse than none at all. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar

There is scope to bring down tariffs in products which are zero-rated with other FTAs. A deal that brings down tariffs on India’s goods to 10 per cent is possible without much sacrifice. But Trump’s bluff and bluster must be called out, whether it is over trade or matters of national security, even as we keep our ties with US on an even keel. Meanwhile, India sent out another sharp message that it will look out for its interests. In a throwback to Trump 1.0, India has proposed retaliatory action on US’ tariffs on steel and aluminium. However, it needs to work out a plan with respect to other areas as well. At the outset, it should be clear that the US’ interests in India go beyond trade per se to persuading India to alter its regulatory systems with respect to GM food, e-commerce, big tech, pharma and other high tech sectors. It is also keen on access to India’s food (maize and soyabean) and dairy sector, besides selling defence equipment and oil. India has enough in its toolkit to squeeze a deal that does not hurt its interests. A levy on e-commerce monopolies, a cap on royalty payments, applying data localisation rules and compulsory licensing of patented drugs can be used to ward off an adverse outcome. In a move that perhaps marks a shift in the way India is approaching trade talks with the US, the External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has firmly refuted the US’ claim, made repeatedly in recent weeks, that India has agreed to nil tariffs on US imports. Jaishankar’s statement last week tersely and firmly clarifies that trade talks are in progress, and ‘nothing is decided until everything is decided’. India has cleared the air, and it was high time that it did so. It coincides with the upcoming trade talks between the two countries this week; Commerce and Industries Minister Piyush Goyal is in the US with his team of negotiators.

Continue Reading

Trending