Connect with us

india

813 of 1,563 NEET-UG Candidates Retake Exam After Grace Marks

813 of 1,563 candidates retook NEET-UG following a Supreme Court order due to initial exam delays. NTA debarred 17 more candidates amid ongoing exam controversies.

Published

on

813 of 1,563 NEET-UG Candidates Retake Exam After Grace Marks
NTA

The National Eligibility cum Entrance Test for Undergraduates (NEET-UG) is a crucial examination for aspiring medical students in India. Recently, the exam has been marred by controversy, primarily revolving around grace marks awarded due to logistical delays and allegations of unfair practices. As many as 813 of the 1,563 candidates who were previously given grace marks appeared for a retest on Sunday, following an order from the Supreme Court. This retest was necessitated by significant delays that occurred at six centers during the original examination held on May 5.

NEET-UG

The Supreme Court intervened in response to petitions filed by candidates affected by the delays. These candidates argued that the time lost due to the late start had a detrimental impact on their performance. In an effort to ensure fairness, the court ordered a retest for these candidates, which was conducted at seven designated centers.

According to a senior official from the National Testing Agency (NTA), which conducts the NEET-UG, 52 percent of the candidates eligible for the retest participated. This translates to 813 out of the 1,563 candidates showing up to reattempt the exam. The official stated, “At least 52 percent — 813 out of 1,563 candidates — appeared for the retest on Sunday.”

The initial award of grace marks aimed to compensate for the loss of time experienced by candidates at the six centers. This decision, however, sparked a significant controversy, with many arguing that it was an inadequate solution to the problem. The retest was seen as a more equitable approach to addressing the issues faced by the affected candidates.

Amidst the ongoing debate over the handling of the NEET-UG exam, the NTA has also been dealing with allegations of irregularities and unfair practices. On Sunday, the agency debarred 17 candidates who had appeared for the exam on May 5 at centers in Bihar. This action follows the earlier debarring of 63 candidates for using unfair means during the exam.

The issue of unfair practices is not new to competitive examinations in India, but the scale of the problem in the NEET-UG has raised concerns about the integrity of the process. The NTA’s actions to debar candidates involved in malpractice aim to uphold the fairness and credibility of the examination.

In addition to the candidates debarred in Bihar, the NTA also took action against 30 more candidates from Gujarat’s Godhara. These candidates were found to have engaged in unfair practices during the exam and were debarred on Saturday. This brings the total number of candidates debarred to over a hundred, reflecting the NTA’s stringent measures to combat exam malpractice.

The controversies surrounding the NEET-UG exam have highlighted the challenges faced by the examination authorities in ensuring a fair and transparent process. The retest for candidates awarded grace marks and the debarring of candidates involved in unfair practices are part of the NTA’s efforts to address these challenges.

The retest conducted on Sunday was crucial in providing a second chance to candidates who were disadvantaged by the delays on May 5. While the participation rate was 52 percent, it remains to be seen how these candidates will perform and whether the retest will satisfactorily address their grievances.

The issue of fairness in competitive exams is critical, as these exams determine the future careers of thousands of students. The NTA’s handling of the NEET-UG exam, including the awarding of grace marks and the subsequent retest, will likely be scrutinized to ensure that all candidates are given an equal opportunity to succeed.

In conclusion, the NEET-UG retest held on Sunday saw the participation of 813 candidates, representing 52 percent of those who were awarded grace marks due to initial exam delays. The retest was conducted following a Supreme Court order, aimed at providing a fair opportunity to affected candidates. Amidst the ongoing controversy over exam irregularities, the NTA continues to take stringent actions against candidates involved in unfair practices, with 17 more candidates debarred on Sunday and 30 additional candidates from Gujarat’s Godhara debarred on Saturday. The resolution of these issues is crucial to maintaining the integrity and credibility of the NEET-UG exam, which plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of aspiring medical students in India.

india

Congress Slams Waqf Bill as Unconstitutional, Vows to Fight in Supreme Court

In a bold move, the Congress party has announced plans to challenge the recently passed Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, in the Supreme Court, labeling it a direct assault on India’s Constitution and the rights of the Muslim community.

Published

on

Image by Arek Socha from Pixabay

In a bold move, the Congress party has announced plans to challenge the recently passed Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, in the Supreme Court, labeling it a direct assault on India’s Constitution and the rights of the Muslim community. The legislation, which cleared both houses of Parliament after heated debates, has sparked widespread controversy, with opposition leaders arguing it undermines religious autonomy and equality.

The Waqf Bill, passed by the Lok Sabha with 288 votes in favor and 232 against, and later by the Rajya Sabha with 128 votes to 95, now awaits President Droupadi Murmu’s assent to become law. However, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, the party’s General Secretary, took to X to declare that the Indian National Congress (INC) will soon contest the bill’s constitutionality in the nation’s highest court. “We are confident and will continue to resist all assaults of the Modi government on the principles, provisions, and practices contained in the Constitution of India,” Ramesh stated, emphasizing the party’s commitment to protecting constitutional values.

The bill introduces significant changes to the Waqf Act of 1995, including the inclusion of non-Muslim members in Waqf Boards and the Central Waqf Council—a move critics argue is discriminatory and lacks justification. Opposition leaders, including Congress and AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi, have slammed the legislation for imposing arbitrary restrictions on Waqf property management, which they say violates Articles 14, 25, 26, 29, and 300A of the Constitution. These articles safeguard equality, religious freedom, minority rights, and property rights, respectively.

Opposition Leaders Rally Against Controversial Waqf Amendment Bill, Citing Threats to Muslim Rights

Congress MP Mohammad Jawed, who has already filed a petition in the Supreme Court, argued that the bill disproportionately increases state control over Waqf affairs compared to other religious trusts, such as those of Hindus and Sikhs, which enjoy greater self-regulation. The amendments also remove the Waqf-by-user doctrine—a principle upheld by the Supreme Court that recognizes properties as Waqf through long-standing religious use—further fueling concerns about the erosion of Muslim religious rights.

The debate in Parliament was intense, with the Rajya Sabha discussion stretching over 13 hours. Opposition leaders like Mallikarjun Kharge called the bill “anti-Muslim” and demanded its withdrawal, alleging it was designed to target Waqf properties for eventual privatization. “The intention behind this is questionable,” Kharge said, warning of potential communal polarization. Meanwhile, the government, led by the BJP, defended the bill as a step toward transparency and inclusivity, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi calling its passage a “watershed moment” for socio-economic justice.

The controversy has also led to political fallout, with two Janata Dal (United) leaders resigning in protest over their party’s support for the bill. As the legal battle looms, the Congress party’s challenge in the Supreme Court could set a precedent for how religious and property rights are balanced in India’s diverse democracy. Will the judiciary uphold the opposition’s claims, or will the Waqf Bill stand as a new framework for managing Muslim endowments? The nation watches closely as this contentious issue unfolds.

Continue Reading

Karnataka

Karnataka BJP Kicks Off Overnight Protest Against Price Hikes and Muslim Quota

Led by BJP’s state president Vijayendra, the demonstration targets the Congress-led government’s recent price hikes and its controversial decision to introduce a 4% reservation for Muslims […]

Published

on

Photo Kind courtesy : IANS X

Bengaluru, Karnataka: The political air in Karnataka is buzzing as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) launched an overnight protest at Freedom Park in Bengaluru on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. Led by state president BY Vijayendra, the demonstration targets the Congress-led government’s recent price hikes and its controversial decision to introduce a 4% reservation for Muslims in government contracts. With emotions running high, this protest marks a bold stand against what the BJP calls a “burden on the people.”

The protest kicked off at 11 a.m. and stretched into the night, with Vijayendra slamming the Siddaramaiah government for making life tougher for everyday citizens. He pointed to the recent Rs 4 increase in Nandini milk prices—now the third hike since Congress took charge—as an “Ugadi gift” that’s left families struggling. “This government promised relief but delivered only rising costs,” Vijayendra said, vowing to keep the pressure on until the hikes are rolled back.

A Fight Against Rising Costs and Policy Shifts

The BJP isn’t stopping at milk prices. Vijayendra accused the government of jacking up water tariffs, petrol costs, and more, hitting the poor and farmers the hardest. He also took aim at the 4% quota for Muslims in public contracts, labeling it “unconstitutional” and a move that sidelines other backward classes like SCs, STs, and OBCs. “This isn’t about fairness—it’s about appeasement politics,” he argued, promising a statewide awareness campaign starting April 10 to rally public support.

The protest saw a strong turnout, with BJP MLAs, MLCs, former legislators, and district leaders joining in. Vijayendra stressed that this is just the beginning, with plans for demonstrations across all district centers on April 4 and taluk-level protests on April 5. “We’re here to fight for the people, not just make noise,” he added, urging the government to rethink its policies.

A Divided Response

While the BJP rallies its base, the Congress government defends its actions. The milk price hike, they say, supports dairy farmers by covering rising production costs, with Karnataka Milk Federation (KMF) Chairman Bheema Naik noting that prices here are still lower than in states like Gujarat or Delhi. On the Muslim quota, the government insists it’s based on socio-economic backwardness, not religion, aligning with long-standing policies under previous administrations.

Yet, the BJP remains unconvinced, accusing Congress of playing the minority card to win votes. The tension spilled into the streets of Bengaluru, with protesters chanting slogans and holding signs, creating a lively yet tense atmosphere. Police kept a close watch, ensuring the demonstration stayed peaceful as traffic flowed nearby and shops stayed open.

What’s Next for Karnataka?

This overnight protest is more than a one-night stand—it’s a signal of bigger battles ahead. With the BJP gearing up for a statewide movement, and the Congress digging in, Karnataka’s political scene is heating up. Residents are left wondering: Will the government back down, or will this spark a longer fight? For now, the focus is on Freedom Park, where voices of dissent echo into the early morning.

Stay tuned as this story develops. Whether it’s about your grocery bill or community rights, this protest could shape Karnataka’s future. Keep checking for the latest updates on price hikes, Muslim quota debates, and more!

Continue Reading

india

Waqf Amendment Bill Heads to Rajya Sabha Today After Lok Sabha Approval

New Delhi: After a heated debate and a late-night vote in the Lok Sabha, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, is set to take center stage in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday, April 3, 2025. The bill, which stirred up quite a storm in the Lower House, passed with 288 votes in favor and 232 against […]

Published

on

Image for representational purposes only

New Delhi: After a heated debate and a late-night vote in the Lok Sabha, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, is set to take center stage in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday, April 3, 2025. The bill, which stirred up quite a storm in the Lower House, passed with 288 votes in favor and 232 against after more than 12 hours of discussion that stretched into the early hours. Now, it’s the Upper House’s turn to weigh in, and people across India are watching closely.

The Lok Sabha debate kicked off Wednesday afternoon and didn’t wrap up until the clock was nearing 2 a.m. Lawmakers from all sides dug into the details, with the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) pushing hard for the bill’s passage. Alongside the Waqf Bill, the Lok Sabha also greenlit a resolution supporting President’s Rule in Manipur—a busy night, to say the least.

What’s on the Rajya Sabha Agenda?

Today, Union Home Minister Amit Shah is expected to bring the Waqf Amendment Bill to the Rajya Sabha floor. He’ll also move a resolution to confirm President’s Rule in Manipur, which was imposed on February 13, 2025, under Article 356(1) of the Constitution. The Upper House has carved out eight hours for this debate, so buckle up—it’s going to be another long one.

Meanwhile, over in the Lok Sabha, Thursday’s lineup includes the Coastal Shipping Bill, 2024, presented by Minister Sarbananda Sonowal. There’s also a statement from Minister Dr. Chandra Sekhar Pemmasani about pulling funds from the Contingency Fund of India to cover interest on Sovereign Guarantee Bonds for Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL). It’s a packed day for Parliament as the Budget Session nears its end on April 4.

Why the Waqf Bill Matters

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill aims to shake up how Waqf boards—bodies that manage properties dedicated to religious and charitable causes in the Muslim community—are run. The government says it’s all about boosting transparency and efficiency, but not everyone’s on board. Opposition parties have called it “unconstitutional” and a direct attack on minority rights, sparking protests and fiery exchanges in Parliament.

After the Lok Sabha gave its nod, the bill now faces the Rajya Sabha test. With the NDA holding a strong majority in both houses, the government’s confident it’ll sail through. Still, the opposition isn’t backing down, promising to fight tooth and nail to protect what they see as a cornerstone of India’s secular fabric.

A Late-Night Victory in Lok Sabha

The Lok Sabha session was anything but quiet. Opposition members slammed the government’s handling of Manipur, even as they supported the President’s Rule resolution. Amit Shah defended the Centre’s efforts, saying every step has been taken to restore peace in the troubled northeastern state. By the time the Waqf Bill vote rolled around, the tally—288 for, 232 against—showed the NDA’s numbers held strong.

For many, the bill’s passage feels like a turning point. Supporters say it’ll modernize Waqf property management, while critics fear it’s a step toward centralizing control and sidelining Muslim voices. Either way, the Rajya Sabha debate today will likely set the tone for what’s next.

What’s at Stake?

This isn’t just about a bill—it’s about trust, governance, and how India balances its diverse communities. The Waqf Amendment Bill has already sparked nationwide conversations, from political rallies to social media buzz. As it heads to the Rajya Sabha, all eyes are on how lawmakers will shape its future—and what it means for the country.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version