Connect with us

Karnataka

Bajrang Dal activist Harsha murder case: High Court rejects bail application of accused

The Karnataka High Court on Monday rejected the bail application of the 8th accused in connection with the murder of Bajrang Dal activist Harsha.

Published

on

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside NCLT Order Allowing Windmill Operation Without Permission
(Representational image)

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court on Monday rejected the bail application of the 8th accused in connection with the murder of Bajrang Dal activist Harsha.

A division bench of the Karnataka High Court dismissed the bail application filed by the 8th accused in Shimoga Bajrang Dal activist Harsha’s murder case. Faraj Pasha, the eighth accused in the case, had appealed to the High Court challenging the order of the NIA special court which rejected the bail application. Justice Srinivas Harish Kumar and G. Basavaraja’s bench dismissed the appeal and ordered.

The bench opined that it is not possible to consider at this stage whether the RGdar (accused) is a member of a terrorist organization or not, and the charges made under the UAPA Act are undoubtedly crimes against the nation and threaten the unity, integrity, security and sovereignty of the country.

Besides, it is also a crime against society. As the facts of this case illustrate, all the accused, who appear to be communalists, had no personal grudge against deceased Harsha. Harsha was chosen for the assassination with the intention of instilling fear among the Hindus. Thus, the bench said in its order that the fact that the appellant is young and has no criminal background is not a basis for granting him bail.

Reference to Evidence
CCTV footage, phone call details and witness statements also prove the active participation of the appellant in the act. So on the face of it, the prosecution is able to prove the merits of its case against the accused. According to the evidence submitted by the investigators, accused 1 to 6 in the case had informally organized and decided to kill Harsha to sow fear. Although the 8th accused in the case was named later, he came to know about the conspiracy of accused number one to seven and later followed Harsha and informed those accused to help him execute his plan. Therefore, the bench held that the appellant was also a part of the conspiracy.

Special Prosecutor P. who argued on behalf of NIA during the trial. Prasannakumar, bail cannot be granted for any reason even if the prosecution once proves that the allegations in the charge sheet against the accused are prima facie true. It was argued that the court should not influence the granting of bail by factors such as the young age of the accused and the background of the crime.

The allegations against the appellant are that Harish, who was killed on February 20, 2022, acted as an informant to another accused by keeping a watch on his movements. The Special Court on December 17, 2022 dismissed the petitioner’s bail application.

Karnataka

Karnataka Council Passes FAR Amendment Bill

Karnataka Council approves FAR Bill amidst uproar. Premium FAR capped at 0.4%, Transferable Development Rights at 0.6%.

Published

on

Karnataka Council Passes FAR Amendment Bill
(Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar | File Photo PTI )

The Legislative Council approved the bill enabling the sale and purchase of premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) despite the BJP members staging a walkout during the session on Thursday.

Presented by Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, who oversees Bengaluru City Development, the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Bill 2024 received passage in the Council after its prior approval in the Assembly. This legislation permits developers to augment building floors by acquiring additional FAR through a fee payment equivalent to 40% of the guidance value, as sanctioned by local planning authorities. Furthermore, the bill sanctions the sale of FAR.

According to Shivakumar, the inclusion of premium FAR provision is anticipated to augment the revenues of local planning authorities, enabling investment in developmental endeavors. The premium FAR allotment is capped at 0.4%, with Transferable Development Rights limited to 0.6%.

The bill mandates that the proceeds from premium FAR fees be allocated towards land acquisition and the enhancement of basic amenities. Presently, FAR determination hinges on factors like road width, zoning regulations, and other pertinent parameters.

Expressing concerns, BJP MLCs cautioned against potential traffic congestion arising from the proliferation of buildings due to additional FAR. They proposed referring the matter to a select House committee for comprehensive deliberation, while some members advocated for an in-depth discussion before tabling the bill.

Shivakumar defended the legislation, asserting its simplification aimed at benefiting all stakeholders and bolstering the revenues of local planning authorities. He underscored that the previous BJP administration under Basavaraj Bommai had intentions to amend this law.

“We’ve introduced certain amendments to the law. Premium FAR has been operational in Mangaluru for some time now, generating approximately Rs 3,000 crore in additional revenue over the past six years. This amendment extends the same benefit to the entire state,” remarked Shivakumar.

However, BJP members opposed the bill and subsequently staged a walkout from the Council.

In addition, the Council ratified the BBMP Property Tax Amendment Bill, which previously received approval in the Assembly.

Shivakumar elucidated that the bill aimed to rectify an oversight from the previous government, which led to substantial penalties on property owners. He highlighted that the 15th Finance Commission stipulated the release of grants contingent upon property tax aligning with the guidance value, necessitating the introduction of this amendment bill.

Continue Reading

Karnataka

Forest personnel in Karnataka search for leopard, find dog

Forest officials in Rajarajeshwari Nagar were on high alert on Monday and Tuesday in response to reports of leopard sightings from concerned residents.

Published

on

Forest personnel in Karnataka search for leopard, find dog
(Representational Image)

Forest officials in Rajarajeshwari Nagar were on high alert on Monday and Tuesday in response to reports of leopard sightings from concerned residents. However, their efforts were met with an unexpected discovery. Despite the urgency of the calls, upon investigation, officials determined that the alleged leopard was, in fact, a dog.

Responding to multiple calls from RR Nagar residents who claimed to have seen a leopard in their vicinity on February 11 and later on February 19, forest personnel conducted a thorough search operation. However, their efforts yielded no evidence of a big cat prowling the area.

Even as some residents maintained night vigils in hopes of catching a glimpse of the elusive creature, no leopard was sighted. The situation escalated when residents of a local apartment complex shared CCTV footage capturing an animal moving along the road, albeit unclearly.

With concerns mounting, residents promptly alerted forest authorities, presuming the creature to be a leopard. Forest officials mobilized their resources for a comprehensive search, only to discover that the supposed leopard was, in reality, a domestic dog.

The incident highlights the importance of accurate identification and prompt response in wildlife management, even in urban areas where encounters with wildlife are rare but not unheard of.

Continue Reading

Karnataka

Karnataka mandates state anthem for all schools

The Kannada & Culture Department reversed its decision, now mandating all schools to sing the state anthem. Confusion stemmed from a “printing mistake.

Published

on

Karnataka mandates state anthem for all schools
(Representative Image:tclnigerialtd)

The Kannada and Culture Department, which previously issued an order excluding private schools from singing the state anthem during assemblies, has now reversed its decision. In a new government order issued on Wednesday, it has been clarified that all schools, including private ones, should sing the state anthem. Kannada and Culture Minister Shivaraj Tangadagi attributed the confusion to a “printing mistake.”

The issue was brought up in the Assembly by Leader of Opposition R Ashoka, who questioned the initial order’s intention of excluding private schools from including the state anthem, “Jaya Bharatha Jananiya Thanujathe,” penned by Kuvempu, in their assemblies. He expressed bewilderment at why private schools were being excluded from the purview of the education department.

Ashoka criticized the officials for such decisions and expressed frustration with Minister Tangadagi’s apparent lack of control over them. The BJP state president BY Vijayendra demanded an apology from the state government, citing a recent attempt by an official from the Social Welfare Department to alter Kuvempu’s slogan in residential schools as another instance of disrespect towards the poet.

Senior BJP MLA Suresh Kumar emphasized the Kannada and Culture Department’s responsibility to safeguard the Kannada language and questioned the rationale behind such orders. Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao downplayed the issue, stating that it was a minor matter that has already been rectified, but his statement was met with condemnation from BJP members.

Tangadagi clarified that the confusion arose during the preparation of the government order, where the term “all schools” was inadvertently changed, leading to the exclusion of private schools. He termed it a “printing mistake” and assured that it has been rectified. Law Minister HK Patil acknowledged the lapse and promised action against those responsible for the error. The latest government order issued by the department now includes all schools, irrespective of their ownership status.

Continue Reading

Trending