Connect with us

India

Centre Urges Supreme Court to Reject Same-Sex Marriage Challenges

Published

on

Same-Sex Marriage: Five-Judge Constitution Bench to Make Decision on April 18
Photo:-barandbench.com

New Delhi: The Centre’s recent filing to the Supreme Court of India reiterating its stance against same-sex marriage has sparked controversy and debate across the country. In its affidavit, the Centre stated that same-sex marriage is not compatible with the concept of an “Indian family unit,” which includes a husband, a wife, and children born out of their union. It argued that same-sex marriage violates existing personal and codified law provisions and cannot be recognized under the country’s legal framework.

Despite the decriminalization of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalized consensual same-sex relationships, the Centre has maintained that LGBTQ+ couples do not have a fundamental right to same-sex marriage. The affidavit urged the Supreme Court to reject the challenges to the current legal framework lodged by LGBTQ+ couples.

The Centre also claimed that living together as partners and having a sexual relationship, which is now decriminalized, is not comparable to the concept of an Indian family unit. It argued that marriage necessarily presupposes a union between two persons of the opposite sex and that this definition is ingrained into the very idea and concept of marriage.

The Centre further emphasized that the parties entering into marriage create an institution with its own public significance, and that seeking legal recognition for same-sex marriage has far-reaching ramifications beyond simple recognition. Family issues are far beyond mere recognition and registration of marriage between persons belonging to the same gender, the affidavit added.

Several gay couples in recent months have asked the Supreme Court to recognize same-sex marriages, setting the stage for a legal face-off with the Narendra Modi-led Union Government. However, the Centre argued that it would not be permissible to change the entire legislative policy of the country deeply embedded in religious and societal norms. Amongst Hindus, marriage is a sacrament and a holy union for performance of reciprocal duties between a man and a woman. In Muslims, it is a contract, but again is envisaged only between a biological man and a biological woman.

The Centre’s stance on same-sex marriage has drawn criticism from LGBTQ+ activists and their supporters across India. Many believe that the Centre’s argument that same-sex marriage violates existing law provisions is outdated and discriminatory. The Indian LGBTQ+ community has fought for years for equal rights and recognition under the law, and the Centre’s recent filing is seen by many as a step back in this fight.

The Supreme Court’s decision on this matter will be closely watched, as it will have far-reaching consequences for the LGBTQ+ community in India. The legal recognition of same-sex marriage could go a long way in addressing the discrimination and stigma faced by the community, while the rejection of such recognition would further marginalize and isolate LGBTQ+ individuals in the country.

In conclusion, the Centre’s recent filing to the Supreme Court reiterating its stance against same-sex marriage has sparked debate and controversy across India. The LGBTQ+ community and their supporters view the Centre’s argument as outdated and discriminatory, while the Centre maintains that same-sex marriage violates existing law provisions and is not compatible with the concept of an Indian family unit. The Supreme Court’s decision on this matter will have far-reaching consequences for the LGBTQ+ community in India.

India

Gangster-turned-Politician Mukhtar Ansari Dies of Cardiac Arrest

Jailed gangster-turned-politician Mukhtar Ansari has passed away at the age of 63 due to a cardiac arrest.

Published

on

Gangster-turned-Politician Mukhtar Ansari Dies of Cardiac Arrest
(File Photo: ndtv)

Jailed gangster-turned-politician Mukhtar Ansari has passed away at the age of 63 due to a cardiac arrest. Ansari, a five-time former MLA from Mau in Uttar Pradesh, had been incarcerated in jails in both Uttar Pradesh and Punjab since 2005. His death comes amidst a flurry of controversy and speculation surrounding his health and treatment while in custody.

Ansari was rushed to the Rani Durgavati Medical College in Banda, Uttar Pradesh, by jail authorities after complaining of vomiting and being found unconscious. Despite efforts by a team of nine doctors, he succumbed to the cardiac arrest.

The news of his death prompted a significant security response, with a large team of police personnel deployed outside the hospital. Prohibitory orders under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code were enforced across Uttar Pradesh following Ansari’s demise. Additionally, additional police personnel and Central Reserve Police Force teams were deployed in several districts as a precautionary measure.

This development comes in the wake of earlier hospitalizations of Ansari, which his brother, Ghazipur MP Afzal Ansari, attributed to alleged poisoning. Afzal Ansari claimed that Mukhtar Ansari had been given a poisonous substance in his food while in jail, leading to deteriorating health. The prison department, however, refuted these claims, stating that Ansari’s health had deteriorated due to other reasons, including a fall in the washroom.

The circumstances surrounding Ansari’s death have reignited debates about prisoner rights, medical care in jails, and the treatment of high-profile inmates. The controversy surrounding his demise is likely to persist as investigations into the events leading up to his death unfold.

In conclusion, Mukhtar Ansari’s passing marks the end of a controversial and tumultuous chapter in Uttar Pradesh’s political landscape. However, it also raises pertinent questions about the treatment of prisoners and the adequacy of medical facilities in jails. As the investigation progresses, the true circumstances of Ansari’s demise may come to light, providing closure to his family and supporters while sparking broader discussions about prison reform in India.

Continue Reading

Karnataka

Maoist Activity in Sullia, Karnataka: ANF Conducts Operations

Learn about the heightened Anti-Naxal Force (ANF) activity in Koojimalai forest following recent sightings of suspected Maoists.

Published

on

Maoist Activity in Sullia, Karnataka: ANF Conducts Operations
(File Photo - deccanherald)

In response to escalating concerns over suspected Naxalite activity, the Anti-Naxal Force (ANF) has intensified combing operations in the dense expanse of Koojimalai forest. Reports indicate a surge in sightings of individuals believed to be associated with Maoist groups, prompting ANF jawans to bolster their presence in the region.

On Thursday, yet another sighting of a suspected Naxalite was reported from a heavily wooded area within the forest. Eyewitness accounts from a worker in the rubber plantation suggest the presence of an unfamiliar woman in the vicinity, igniting efforts to locate her amidst the dense foliage.

The ANF has wasted no time in responding to these reports, deploying teams to conduct thorough searches across the Ainekidu and Koojimale estate areas. Sources within the ANF have hinted at the possibility of lingering Naxalite presence along the fringes of the Pushpagiri forest sanctuary, underscoring the importance of vigilance in this region.

Confirming the gravity of the situation, ANF sources have acknowledged receiving multiple complaints regarding the presence of unidentified individuals in the Sampaje-Koojimalai corridor. This surge in activity has prompted the ANF to fortify its operations, ensuring a proactive approach to combat any potential threats posed by Naxalite elements.

As the ANF remains steadfast in its mission to maintain peace and security in the region, residents of Koojimalai and surrounding areas can take solace in the concerted efforts being made to address the looming specter of Naxalism. With continued vigilance and collaboration between law enforcement agencies and local communities, the menace of Naxalite insurgency can be effectively curtailed, safeguarding the tranquility of this pristine forest enclave.

Continue Reading

Bengaluru

NIA Arrests Key Conspirator in Bengaluru Cafe Blast Case

National Investigation Agency (NIA) arrests Muzammil Shareef, a key conspirator in the Bengaluru cafe blast case.

Published

on

NIA Arrests Key Conspirator in Bengaluru Cafe Blast Case
(Photo: Dainik Jagran)

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has made significant progress in the investigation into the Improvised Explosive Device (IED) blast at the Rameshwaram cafe in Bengaluru’s Brookfield. On March 1, Muzammil Shareef, identified as a key conspirator, was apprehended by NIA teams during crackdowns at 18 locations across Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh.

Muzammil Shareef’s arrest comes after NIA took over the case on March 3, following initial investigations by Bengaluru’s Central Crime Branch (CCB). The blast, carried out by the main accused Mussavir Shazeeb Hussain, resulted in severe injuries to several customers and staff members, causing extensive damage to the property.

NIA’s investigations have unveiled Muzammil Shareef’s role in providing logistic support to the prime accused and another conspirator, Abdul Matheen Taha. While Hussain and Taha remain at large, NIA’s efforts continue to bring them to justice.

The blast, triggered by an IED, necessitated a swift and thorough investigation by NIA to ensure accountability and prevent further threats to public safety. With ongoing efforts and collaboration with law enforcement agencies, NIA remains committed to unraveling the complete network behind such acts of terrorism.

Stay tuned for more updates on NIA’s investigation into the Bengaluru cafe blast case as efforts intensify to bring all perpetrators to justice and safeguard our communities from such heinous acts.

Continue Reading

Trending