Connect with us

India

D K Shivakumar’s Corruption Case: SC Dismisses CBI’s Plea Over Stay on Probe

Supreme Court upholds Karnataka High Court’s interim stay on CBI probe against Deputy CM D K Shivakumar in corruption case. Legal battle intensifies.

Published

on

D K Shivakumar's Corruption Case: SC Dismisses CBI's Plea Over Stay on Probe
Photo:-theweek.in

the Supreme Court has upheld the Karnataka High Court’s decision to grant an interim stay on the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe against the Deputy Chief Minister of Karnataka, D K Shivakumar, in a corruption case. The apex court’s bench, comprising Justice B R Gavai, Justice C T Ravikumar, and Justice Sanjay Kumar, dismissed the CBI’s appeal against the high court’s order. This article delves into the details of the case, the reasons behind the high court’s decision, and the implications for Shivakumar.

Shivakumar Graft Case: SC Dismisses CBI’s Plea

Despite an earlier order in favor of the CBI, the division bench of the Karnataka High Court granted an interim stay on the proceedings related to the corruption case involving D K Shivakumar. The Additional Solicitor General, SV Raju, argued on behalf of the CBI but failed to persuade the Supreme Court to interfere in the matter. Shivakumar’s counsel, Senior Advocate Abhishek Singhvi, pointed out that the CBI had chosen to appeal only against an interim order and not subsequent orders passed by the division bench. Consequently, the Supreme Court granted the CBI the liberty to request the high court for a speedy disposal of the case.

Karnataka High Court’s Stand

On February 10, the Karnataka High Court issued a stay on the CBI proceedings against D K Shivakumar in the corruption case. The court further directed the probe agency to furnish an action taken report concerning the case registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Notably, the court raised questions about the delay in investigating the cases against Shivakumar, which dated back to 2020. The high court emphasized the need for the CBI to present a conclusive report promptly.

Background of the Case

The legal troubles for D K Shivakumar began in 2017 when the Income Tax Department conducted a raid at his premises. Subsequently, based on information provided by the Income Tax Department, the Enforcement Directorate initiated a separate probe against him. Following their investigation, the CBI sought sanction from the state government to file a First Information Report (FIR) against the President of the Congress’ Karnataka unit.

The state government granted the sanction on September 25, 2019, and the CBI filed the FIR on October 3, 2020. Challenging the FIR, D K Shivakumar approached the High Court, leading to the recent development of the interim stay on the CBI’s probe.

Implications and Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the interim stay on the CBI probe has significant implications for D K Shivakumar and the ongoing investigation. While the legal battle continues, it remains to be seen how the case unfolds in the coming days. The high court’s emphasis on expeditious resolution and the CBI’s pursuit of a conclusive report play crucial roles in determining the outcome of the corruption case. As the matter remains sub judice, all stakeholders await further developments in the legal proceedings.

India

Pragya Thakur Presents Herself in Court for 2008 Malegaon Blast Case

BJP MP Pragya Thakur appears in court for 2008 Malegaon blast case, citing health reasons for her late arrival.

Published

on

Pragya Thakur Presents Herself in Court for 2008 Malegaon Blast Case
File photo: BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur. | IANS

Mumbai: Bharatiya Janata Party MP Pragya Singh Thakur, one of the accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, made her appearance in a special NIA court in Mumbai on Monday. Thakur arrived at the court around 2 pm, a couple of hours after the other accused in the case had already presented themselves.

During her court appearance, Thakur cited health issues as the reason for her delayed arrival, explaining that it hindered her ability to wake up early in the morning. As a result of this, the court decided to adjourn the proceedings to October 3, when they would record the statements of all the accused involved.

On September 14, the prosecution had informed the court that the process of collecting evidence for the case had been completed, and there was no need for further examination of prosecution witnesses. Following this, the court typically proceeds to record the statements of the accused under section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). In this stage, the court poses general questions to the accused, allowing them to personally address any circumstances that may have arisen from the evidence presented against them.

On this particular day, only six of the accused appeared before the court: Pragya Singh Thakur, Lt Col Prasad Purohit, Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, and Sameer Kulkarni. Sudhakar Dwivedi was notably absent, and his lawyer attributed his absence to religious rituals. However, the court rejected this explanation and issued a bailable warrant of Rs 5,000 against Dwivedi.

The Malegaon blast case dates back to September 29, 2008, when an explosive device attached to a motorcycle detonated near a mosque in Malegaon, a town approximately 200 km from Mumbai in northern Maharashtra. The incident resulted in six fatalities and over 100 individuals sustaining injuries. Initially, the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) handled the investigation, but it was later transferred to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2011.

Continue Reading

India

Bridge Collapse in Surendranagar Gujarat; four injured

Bridge collapse: 40-ton dumper crosses banned bridge on Panchayat road near Wadhwan city, raising safety concerns. Learn more.

Published

on

Bridge Collapse in Surendranagar Gujarat; four injured
S Grab:-Twitter/@Kshatriyadilip

In a concerning incident in Gujarat’s Surendranagar district, an old bridge over the Bhogavo river collapsed, resulting in injuries to four individuals. The incident transpired on a Sunday evening when a 40-ton dumper attempted to cross the bridge, despite heavy vehicle restrictions on the panchayat road near Wadhwan city. This article delves into the details of this bridge collapse and the circumstances leading up to it.

The Bridge Collapse

The collapse of the bridge occurred suddenly, sending shockwaves through the local community. A dumper, along with two motorcycles, was traversing the bridge when the first slab gave way, causing minor injuries to the four people on it. The heavy vehicle and motorcycles plunged into the Bhogavo river, leading to a chaotic and dangerous situation.

Age and Responsibility

This bridge, now making headlines for all the wrong reasons, had a significant history. It had been serving the community for almost four decades, with the responsibility for its maintenance lying with the state Road and Buildings Department. Despite its age, the bridge was considered safe, but recent events have brought its structural integrity into question.

Warning Signs Ignored

It’s worth noting that authorities had taken precautions to prevent such incidents. A warning board was prominently displayed, and barricades were erected to deter heavy vehicles from using the bridge. These measures were taken to ensure the safety of all road users. However, despite these clear warnings and restrictions, a 40-ton dumper ventured onto the bridge, ultimately leading to the collapse of its first slab.

The Aftermath

The aftermath of the bridge collapse has raised important questions about infrastructure maintenance and adherence to safety guidelines. Local authorities are currently assessing the situation, and investigations are underway to determine the exact cause of the collapse. Meanwhile, the injured individuals are receiving medical attention, and efforts are being made to retrieve the vehicles from the Bhogavo river.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the collapse of the bridge in Surendranagar is a stark reminder of the importance of adhering to safety regulations and guidelines. It is imperative that both authorities and citizens exercise caution when using aging infrastructure. This incident highlights the need for proactive maintenance and strict enforcement of vehicle restrictions on such bridges to prevent similar tragedies in the future.

Continue Reading

India

Uttar Pradesh: Doctor Beaten to Death Over Land Dispute

a doctor, Ghanshyam Tripathi, was fatally beaten over a land dispute. His family awaits Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s visit before cremation.

Published

on

Uttar Pradesh: Doctor Beaten to Death Over Land Dispute
screen Grab\X

Uttar Pradesh: A 53-year-old doctor was allegedly beaten to death in the city, and his family has announced that they will only proceed with his cremation once Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath visits them.

The deceased, Ghanshyam Tripathi, worked at the Jaisinghpur Community Health Centre. His tragic demise occurred following an incident where he was reportedly assaulted by a group of individuals involved in a land dispute in the Kotwali area on Saturday.

In response to the family’s decision to delay the cremation, a significant police presence has been established near his residence in Sakhauli Kalan village, situated in the Lambhua tehsil.

Superintendent of Police Somen Barma disclosed that the doctor had acquired a piece of land from Ajay Narayan Singh, the primary suspect in the murder case. Barma explained that the accused were demanding additional funds and were withholding possession of the land from the doctor.

However, specific details regarding the size and cost of the land were not provided by the police.

On Saturday, the doctor’s wife, Nisha Tripathi, revealed that the disputed land was located behind a Saraswati Shishu Mandir and had been a constant source of conflict.

The SP announced that four teams had been dispatched to apprehend the suspects, with three individuals already detained in connection with the case. Additionally, the e-rickshaw driver who had transported the injured doctor to his home was being questioned.

Nisha Tripathi alleged that her husband had been killed by “some people who live in Narayanpur” over the land dispute. She recounted that her husband had come home in the evening, taken Rs 3,000 from her for a map-making service, and then left the house. He returned later, injured, after having snacks. She claimed that Jagdish Narayan Singh’s son, a resident of Narayanpur, had assaulted her husband, ultimately leading to his death in the hospital.

District Magistrate Jasjeet Kaur convened a meeting on Sunday regarding the incident. She instructed the Sadar SDM to locate the land associated with the accused and their family members. Furthermore, the SDM was directed to verify that the land in their possession did not encroach upon gram sabha land or constitute illegal property.

Continue Reading

Trending