Sydney: Sydney recently witnessed a session at the Raisina@Sydney Dialogue where External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar criticized billionaire investor George Soros for his views on India’s politics. Mr Jaishankar referred to Soros as an “old, rich opinionated, and dangerous person” who still thinks that his views should determine how the entire world works. He accused Soros of investing resources in shaping narratives and influencing electoral outcomes.
Mr Jaishankar further stated that people like Soros believe that an election is only good if the person they want to win does so. If the results throw up a different outcome, they will say that it is a flawed democracy. Soros advocates for an open society but uses it as a pretence to achieve his own agenda.
Soros had earlier accused PM Modi and Adani of being close allies, and had claimed that the Adani group was involved in stock manipulation. Jaishankar responded by stating that India was a democratic country with an electoral process that is not questioned. He added that Soros’s suggestion of planning to strip millions of Muslims of their citizenship was ridiculous.
Globalisation provides seamless opportunities but also allows for the shaping of narratives and the manipulation of agendas. Jaishankar criticised Soros’s scaremongering tactics, which create a fear psychosis and damage the societal fabric.
Union Minister of Women and Child Development, Smriti Irani, also criticised Soros for wanting to break Indian democracy. She stated that his desire to fund over one billion dollars to target leaders like PM Modi is a significant threat. Irani warned that democracy has prevailed in India and will continue to do so under PM Modi’s leadership.
The BJP has lashed out over Soros’s comments, and Irani’s response has been echoed by party members. They have asserted that they will fight any attempt to weaken Indian democracy.
Soros’s remarks have caused a stir in India, and the criticism from Indian officials is likely to escalate. The billionaire investor has a reputation for supporting liberal causes and has been an outspoken critic of governments that do not align with his views.
India, on the other hand, has a history of democratic processes, and its citizens take pride in participating in the electoral process. The criticism levelled at Soros is reflective of the country’s resilience in protecting its democracy.
As globalisation continues to shape the world, countries like India will face challenges from those who seek to manipulate narratives and influence political outcomes. The response from Indian officials shows that they will not allow such attempts to weaken their democracy.
The exchange between Jaishankar and Soros highlights the need for open dialogue and critical thinking. Both sides have the right to express their views, but they should be prepared to face criticism for their comments.
In conclusion, the criticism levelled at Soros by Indian officials highlights the country’s commitment to protecting its democracy. The response also shows that the country is aware of attempts to manipulate narratives and influence political outcomes. As the world becomes more connected, countries must be prepared to face such challenges and stand firm in protecting their democratic processes.