india
SC Decision: Same-Sex Marriage Left to Parliament
SC denies legal recognition to same-sex marriages. Chief Justice Chandrachud cites need for legislative change, emphasizes queer rights.

A Constitution bench comprising five judges at the Supreme Court declined to bestow official recognition on same-sex marriages. Chief Justice of India, D. Y. Chandrachud, who presided over the bench’s deliberations, announced the verdict on 21 petitions seeking legal endorsement for same-sex marriages. He emphasized the court’s role as one of interpretation, not legislation, and suggested that the onus to amend the Special Marriage Act rested with Parliament.
Justice Chandrachud noted that the bench had rendered four separate judgments on the matter, with Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S. Ravindra Bhat, and P. S. Narasimha contributing their perspectives. Justice Hima Kohli was also part of the five-judge panel. The Chief Justice, while directing the central government and state authorities to prevent discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community, asserted that queerness is a natural phenomenon with historical roots and is not confined to urban or elite settings.
Justice Kaul expressed his agreement with the Chief Justice’s stance on granting certain rights to queer couples, emphasizing the need to view non-heterosexual and heterosexual unions as two sides of the same coin. Justice Bhat, in delivering the operative portion of his verdict, expressed agreement on certain points while differing on others.
Chief Justice Chandrachud reaffirmed that the authority to alter the Special Marriage Act lies with Parliament and not the court, as the court’s role is limited to interpreting the law. He underscored that Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had pledged the government’s formation of a committee to determine the rights and entitlements of individuals in queer unions.
Furthermore, the Chief Justice directed authorities to raise awareness about queer rights and ensure that intersex children are not subjected to sex-change operations before they can fully comprehend the consequences. He also mandated a preliminary inquiry by the police before registering an FIR against queer couples regarding their relationship.
Justice Chandrachud asserted that homosexuality and queerness are not exclusive to urban spaces and are not limited by caste or class boundaries. He argued against the notion that marriage is a static and unchanging institution, contending that the freedom to choose a life partner is intrinsic to the right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Recognizing such unions is vital, he added, and failing to do so would be discriminatory. The Chief Justice stressed that all individuals, including those who identify as queer, have the right to assess the moral quality of their lives, and the law should not discriminate against queer couples by assuming that only heterosexual couples can be good parents.
The verdict was delivered following a ten-day hearing that concluded on May 11. During the arguments, the central government expressed concerns about the potential consequences of a constitutional declaration on same-sex marriage petitions.
The Supreme Court had clarified that it would not delve into personal laws governing marriages while deciding on the petitions seeking judicial validation for same-sex marriages, asserting that the definition of “a man and a woman” in the Special Marriage Act was not strictly based on gender.
Some of the petitioners had urged the court to leverage its authority and prestige to encourage society to recognize such unions, which would enable LGBTQIA++ individuals to lead dignified lives, akin to their heterosexual counterparts.
LGBTQIA++ encompasses lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, pansexual, two-spirit, asexual, and ally persons. On May 3, the central government pledged to establish a committee led by the cabinet secretary to address the humane concerns of same-sex couples without delving into the legal aspects of their marriages. On April 27, the court questioned whether social welfare benefits, such as joint bank accounts and nominations in provident funds and pension schemes, could be extended to same-sex couples without legalizing their marriages.
india
Congress Slams Waqf Bill as Unconstitutional, Vows to Fight in Supreme Court
In a bold move, the Congress party has announced plans to challenge the recently passed Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, in the Supreme Court, labeling it a direct assault on India’s Constitution and the rights of the Muslim community.
In a bold move, the Congress party has announced plans to challenge the recently passed Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, in the Supreme Court, labeling it a direct assault on India’s Constitution and the rights of the Muslim community. The legislation, which cleared both houses of Parliament after heated debates, has sparked widespread controversy, with opposition leaders arguing it undermines religious autonomy and equality.
The Waqf Bill, passed by the Lok Sabha with 288 votes in favor and 232 against, and later by the Rajya Sabha with 128 votes to 95, now awaits President Droupadi Murmu’s assent to become law. However, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, the party’s General Secretary, took to X to declare that the Indian National Congress (INC) will soon contest the bill’s constitutionality in the nation’s highest court. “We are confident and will continue to resist all assaults of the Modi government on the principles, provisions, and practices contained in the Constitution of India,” Ramesh stated, emphasizing the party’s commitment to protecting constitutional values.
The bill introduces significant changes to the Waqf Act of 1995, including the inclusion of non-Muslim members in Waqf Boards and the Central Waqf Council—a move critics argue is discriminatory and lacks justification. Opposition leaders, including Congress and AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi, have slammed the legislation for imposing arbitrary restrictions on Waqf property management, which they say violates Articles 14, 25, 26, 29, and 300A of the Constitution. These articles safeguard equality, religious freedom, minority rights, and property rights, respectively.
Opposition Leaders Rally Against Controversial Waqf Amendment Bill, Citing Threats to Muslim Rights
Congress MP Mohammad Jawed, who has already filed a petition in the Supreme Court, argued that the bill disproportionately increases state control over Waqf affairs compared to other religious trusts, such as those of Hindus and Sikhs, which enjoy greater self-regulation. The amendments also remove the Waqf-by-user doctrine—a principle upheld by the Supreme Court that recognizes properties as Waqf through long-standing religious use—further fueling concerns about the erosion of Muslim religious rights.
The debate in Parliament was intense, with the Rajya Sabha discussion stretching over 13 hours. Opposition leaders like Mallikarjun Kharge called the bill “anti-Muslim” and demanded its withdrawal, alleging it was designed to target Waqf properties for eventual privatization. “The intention behind this is questionable,” Kharge said, warning of potential communal polarization. Meanwhile, the government, led by the BJP, defended the bill as a step toward transparency and inclusivity, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi calling its passage a “watershed moment” for socio-economic justice.
The controversy has also led to political fallout, with two Janata Dal (United) leaders resigning in protest over their party’s support for the bill. As the legal battle looms, the Congress party’s challenge in the Supreme Court could set a precedent for how religious and property rights are balanced in India’s diverse democracy. Will the judiciary uphold the opposition’s claims, or will the Waqf Bill stand as a new framework for managing Muslim endowments? The nation watches closely as this contentious issue unfolds.
Karnataka
Karnataka BJP Kicks Off Overnight Protest Against Price Hikes and Muslim Quota
Led by BJP’s state president Vijayendra, the demonstration targets the Congress-led government’s recent price hikes and its controversial decision to introduce a 4% reservation for Muslims […]
Bengaluru, Karnataka: The political air in Karnataka is buzzing as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) launched an overnight protest at Freedom Park in Bengaluru on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. Led by state president BY Vijayendra, the demonstration targets the Congress-led government’s recent price hikes and its controversial decision to introduce a 4% reservation for Muslims in government contracts. With emotions running high, this protest marks a bold stand against what the BJP calls a “burden on the people.”
The protest kicked off at 11 a.m. and stretched into the night, with Vijayendra slamming the Siddaramaiah government for making life tougher for everyday citizens. He pointed to the recent Rs 4 increase in Nandini milk prices—now the third hike since Congress took charge—as an “Ugadi gift” that’s left families struggling. “This government promised relief but delivered only rising costs,” Vijayendra said, vowing to keep the pressure on until the hikes are rolled back.
A Fight Against Rising Costs and Policy Shifts
The BJP isn’t stopping at milk prices. Vijayendra accused the government of jacking up water tariffs, petrol costs, and more, hitting the poor and farmers the hardest. He also took aim at the 4% quota for Muslims in public contracts, labeling it “unconstitutional” and a move that sidelines other backward classes like SCs, STs, and OBCs. “This isn’t about fairness—it’s about appeasement politics,” he argued, promising a statewide awareness campaign starting April 10 to rally public support.
The protest saw a strong turnout, with BJP MLAs, MLCs, former legislators, and district leaders joining in. Vijayendra stressed that this is just the beginning, with plans for demonstrations across all district centers on April 4 and taluk-level protests on April 5. “We’re here to fight for the people, not just make noise,” he added, urging the government to rethink its policies.
A Divided Response
While the BJP rallies its base, the Congress government defends its actions. The milk price hike, they say, supports dairy farmers by covering rising production costs, with Karnataka Milk Federation (KMF) Chairman Bheema Naik noting that prices here are still lower than in states like Gujarat or Delhi. On the Muslim quota, the government insists it’s based on socio-economic backwardness, not religion, aligning with long-standing policies under previous administrations.
Yet, the BJP remains unconvinced, accusing Congress of playing the minority card to win votes. The tension spilled into the streets of Bengaluru, with protesters chanting slogans and holding signs, creating a lively yet tense atmosphere. Police kept a close watch, ensuring the demonstration stayed peaceful as traffic flowed nearby and shops stayed open.
What’s Next for Karnataka?
This overnight protest is more than a one-night stand—it’s a signal of bigger battles ahead. With the BJP gearing up for a statewide movement, and the Congress digging in, Karnataka’s political scene is heating up. Residents are left wondering: Will the government back down, or will this spark a longer fight? For now, the focus is on Freedom Park, where voices of dissent echo into the early morning.
Stay tuned as this story develops. Whether it’s about your grocery bill or community rights, this protest could shape Karnataka’s future. Keep checking for the latest updates on price hikes, Muslim quota debates, and more!
india
Waqf Amendment Bill Heads to Rajya Sabha Today After Lok Sabha Approval
New Delhi: After a heated debate and a late-night vote in the Lok Sabha, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, is set to take center stage in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday, April 3, 2025. The bill, which stirred up quite a storm in the Lower House, passed with 288 votes in favor and 232 against […]
New Delhi: After a heated debate and a late-night vote in the Lok Sabha, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, is set to take center stage in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday, April 3, 2025. The bill, which stirred up quite a storm in the Lower House, passed with 288 votes in favor and 232 against after more than 12 hours of discussion that stretched into the early hours. Now, it’s the Upper House’s turn to weigh in, and people across India are watching closely.
The Lok Sabha debate kicked off Wednesday afternoon and didn’t wrap up until the clock was nearing 2 a.m. Lawmakers from all sides dug into the details, with the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) pushing hard for the bill’s passage. Alongside the Waqf Bill, the Lok Sabha also greenlit a resolution supporting President’s Rule in Manipur—a busy night, to say the least.
What’s on the Rajya Sabha Agenda?
Today, Union Home Minister Amit Shah is expected to bring the Waqf Amendment Bill to the Rajya Sabha floor. He’ll also move a resolution to confirm President’s Rule in Manipur, which was imposed on February 13, 2025, under Article 356(1) of the Constitution. The Upper House has carved out eight hours for this debate, so buckle up—it’s going to be another long one.
Meanwhile, over in the Lok Sabha, Thursday’s lineup includes the Coastal Shipping Bill, 2024, presented by Minister Sarbananda Sonowal. There’s also a statement from Minister Dr. Chandra Sekhar Pemmasani about pulling funds from the Contingency Fund of India to cover interest on Sovereign Guarantee Bonds for Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL). It’s a packed day for Parliament as the Budget Session nears its end on April 4.
Why the Waqf Bill Matters
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill aims to shake up how Waqf boards—bodies that manage properties dedicated to religious and charitable causes in the Muslim community—are run. The government says it’s all about boosting transparency and efficiency, but not everyone’s on board. Opposition parties have called it “unconstitutional” and a direct attack on minority rights, sparking protests and fiery exchanges in Parliament.
After the Lok Sabha gave its nod, the bill now faces the Rajya Sabha test. With the NDA holding a strong majority in both houses, the government’s confident it’ll sail through. Still, the opposition isn’t backing down, promising to fight tooth and nail to protect what they see as a cornerstone of India’s secular fabric.
A Late-Night Victory in Lok Sabha
The Lok Sabha session was anything but quiet. Opposition members slammed the government’s handling of Manipur, even as they supported the President’s Rule resolution. Amit Shah defended the Centre’s efforts, saying every step has been taken to restore peace in the troubled northeastern state. By the time the Waqf Bill vote rolled around, the tally—288 for, 232 against—showed the NDA’s numbers held strong.
For many, the bill’s passage feels like a turning point. Supporters say it’ll modernize Waqf property management, while critics fear it’s a step toward centralizing control and sidelining Muslim voices. Either way, the Rajya Sabha debate today will likely set the tone for what’s next.
What’s at Stake?
This isn’t just about a bill—it’s about trust, governance, and how India balances its diverse communities. The Waqf Amendment Bill has already sparked nationwide conversations, from political rallies to social media buzz. As it heads to the Rajya Sabha, all eyes are on how lawmakers will shape its future—and what it means for the country.
-
india2 years ago
“Major Crash of Sukhoi Su-30 and Mirage 2000 Fighter Jets in Madhya Pradesh”
-
Sports2 years ago
WFI meetings on April 16, elections likely to be discussed
-
india1 year ago
PM Modi Meets Deve Gowda for Seat Sharing Talks
-
india1 year ago
Bengaluru: False threat to bomb Raj Bhavan
-
india2 years ago
“AIMIM to Contest 50 Seats in Upcoming Telangana Assembly Elections”
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Anant Ambani: Controversy at the Ambani Pre-Wedding Bash
-
Entertainment2 years ago
Rajinikanth is Moideen Bhai in ‘Lal Salaam’
-
Videos2 years ago
Bidar News : Press Meet Organized By Zilla Kannada Sahitya Parishad