Connect with us

India

Thousands of Farmers Protest in Maharashtra March to Mumbai

The farmers’ demands are numerous and include an immediate financial relief of ₹ 600 per quintal for onion growers who have been severely impacted by a fall in prices.

Published

on

Thousands of Farmers Protest in Maharashtra March to Mumbai
Photo:-@SaamanaOnline/TWT

Mumbai: Thousands of farmers from Maharashtra are marching towards Mumbai to demand various measures from the government to address their grievances. Organized by the Communist Party of India (Marxist), the march started from Dindori in Nashik district and is expected to cover 200 kilometers before reaching Mumbai. Along with farmers, the march also includes workers from the unorganized sector and members of tribal communities.

The farmers’ demands are numerous and include an immediate financial relief of ₹ 600 per quintal for onion growers who have been severely impacted by a fall in prices. The farmers are also demanding uninterrupted electricity supply for 12 hours, a waiver of agricultural loans, steps to arrest the slide in the prices of soybean, cotton, and tur, and immediate relief to farmers affected by recent unseasonal rains and other natural calamities. Additionally, those in the procession are also demanding the implementation of the Old Pension Scheme for state government employees who have joined service post-2005.

The state government has reached out to the protesting farmers, and two cabinet ministers, Dada Bhuse and Atul Save, are scheduled to meet them on their way to Mumbai. While a meeting was scheduled earlier between representatives of the farmers and the state government, it could not take place. The farmers are now demanding that government representatives come and meet them.

Leader of the Opposition Ajit Pawar and CPM MLA Vinod Nikole have urged the government to talk to the farmers. In response, Minister Bhuse said that they will hold a meeting and hopes to reach an understanding with the farmers. Speaking to NDTV, Mr Bhuse said, “They have 14 demands. The government will address them to the extent possible under the ambit of law.”

The ongoing foot march by the farmers is similar to the 2018 ‘Kisan Long March’ from Nashik to Mumbai, also organized by the Left parties, which saw the participation of thousands of farmers. At that time, the farmers had demanded a loan waiver and transfer of forest land to tribal farmers tilling it for years. Once the protest reached Mumbai, then Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis had accepted the farmers’ demands.

The demands of the farmers highlight the various challenges that they face, from falling prices to the impact of natural calamities on their livelihoods. It is imperative for the government to address these challenges and come up with measures that can provide much-needed relief to farmers. It is hoped that the ongoing protests will serve as a wake-up call for the government and spur them into taking action to address the grievances of farmers in Maharashtra and across the country.

India

Shiv Sena MLA Disqualification Hearing Postponed by Maharashtra State Assembly Speaker

Supreme Court instructed Maharashtra Assembly Speaker to report disqualification petition progress and schedule within a week.

Published

on

Shiv Sena MLA Disqualification Hearing Postponed by Maharashtra State Assembly Speaker
(Photo | ANI)

Mumbai: Maharashtra State Assembly Speaker Rahul Narvekar has reserved his decision on setting a schedule for the hearings of disqualification petitions filed against Shiv Sena MLAs, opting to consolidate all these petitions. The next hearing is expected to take place on October 13.

In response to the Supreme Court‘s directive, which required the Maharashtra State Assembly Speaker to submit a progress report and schedule for disqualification petition hearings within a week, Rahul Narvekar summoned both factions of the Shiv Sena for a hearing on Monday. However, the two factions did not reach a consensus on the matter.

During the hearing at Vidhan Bhavan, Speaker Rahul Narvekar emphasized that he is prioritizing justice over haste. He asserted that every MLA facing disqualification should be granted sufficient time to present their case and arguments. “Justice is paramount, and the focus should be on ensuring a fair hearing and resolution of the petitions, rather than rushing the process,” the Speaker stated.

Anil Parab, a Shiv Sena MLC (UBT), expressed concerns that the government was merely stalling the proceedings. He pointed out that the Supreme Court had provided clear guidelines for the disqualification of MLAs, yet the hearings continued to be postponed for various reasons. Parab remarked, “Justice delayed is justice denied. If the disqualification cases against Shiv Sena’s MLAs are similar in nature, it makes sense for the Speaker to consolidate and address them collectively, rather than prolonging the process with separate hearings. The Supreme Court had stipulated a reasonable timeframe, not an indefinite one, as indicated in recent directives.”

Sanjay Shirsat, a Shiv Sena MLA (Shinde), noted that the Speaker had heard their arguments during the Monday hearing. He mentioned that they had requested separate hearings for the disqualification cases, with some members preferring online hearings. Shirsat emphasized the importance of not rushing the resolution of the disqualification petitions and stated, “We are against consolidating the petitions.”

Parab mentioned that during the next hearing on October 13, the Speaker would decide whether to consolidate the petitions or hear them separately. He expressed disappointment that the Speaker did not provide concrete updates during the current hearing. Anil Desai, a leader of Shiv Sena (UBT), added, “The Supreme Court has clearly defined key aspects such as identifying the chief whip and distinguishing the political party’s legislative and organizational roles. Therefore, there is no justification for further delaying the hearings. We remain confident that the Speaker will deliver justice in our favor.”

Continue Reading

India

YSRTP-Congress Merger Decision by End of September: Sharmila

YS Sharmila, YSR Telangana Party founder, met party members to plan for upcoming state Assembly polls and will tour all segments from October.

Published

on

YSRTP-Congress Merger Decision by End of September: Sharmila
Photo: Y.S. Sharmila

Hyderabad: YSR Telangana Party Founder, Y.S. Sharmila, has announced that a decision regarding potential collaboration with the Congress will be reached by the conclusion of this month. Sharmila, who is the sister of Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, conducted a meeting with senior party officials and members to deliberate on various aspects related to the forthcoming Telangana State Assembly elections, as stated in a press release.

During the meeting, the YSR Telangana Party leader emphasized that the determination regarding cooperation with the Congress would be finalized by the end of September, given the rapidly approaching notification deadline for the assembly polls. In the event that no alliance is forged, the party will proceed to contest in all 119 constituencies, according to the release.

Additionally, Sharmila disclosed plans to embark on a tour of all assembly segments commencing in the second week of October. In today’s meeting, she assured party workers that their contributions would be duly acknowledged, and their interests would be safeguarded, as outlined in the release.

There had been speculation that Sharmila would formally engage with AICC leaders during the recent Congress Working Committee meeting held a few days ago. She had previously indicated that her discussions with the Congress party concerning potential collaboration or merger had entered their final stages. Furthermore, Sharmila had met with Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi in the national capital as part of these discussions.

Continue Reading

India

Pragya Thakur Presents Herself in Court for 2008 Malegaon Blast Case

BJP MP Pragya Thakur appears in court for 2008 Malegaon blast case, citing health reasons for her late arrival.

Published

on

Pragya Thakur Presents Herself in Court for 2008 Malegaon Blast Case
File photo: BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur. | IANS

Mumbai: Bharatiya Janata Party MP Pragya Singh Thakur, one of the accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, made her appearance in a special NIA court in Mumbai on Monday. Thakur arrived at the court around 2 pm, a couple of hours after the other accused in the case had already presented themselves.

During her court appearance, Thakur cited health issues as the reason for her delayed arrival, explaining that it hindered her ability to wake up early in the morning. As a result of this, the court decided to adjourn the proceedings to October 3, when they would record the statements of all the accused involved.

On September 14, the prosecution had informed the court that the process of collecting evidence for the case had been completed, and there was no need for further examination of prosecution witnesses. Following this, the court typically proceeds to record the statements of the accused under section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). In this stage, the court poses general questions to the accused, allowing them to personally address any circumstances that may have arisen from the evidence presented against them.

On this particular day, only six of the accused appeared before the court: Pragya Singh Thakur, Lt Col Prasad Purohit, Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, and Sameer Kulkarni. Sudhakar Dwivedi was notably absent, and his lawyer attributed his absence to religious rituals. However, the court rejected this explanation and issued a bailable warrant of Rs 5,000 against Dwivedi.

The Malegaon blast case dates back to September 29, 2008, when an explosive device attached to a motorcycle detonated near a mosque in Malegaon, a town approximately 200 km from Mumbai in northern Maharashtra. The incident resulted in six fatalities and over 100 individuals sustaining injuries. Initially, the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) handled the investigation, but it was later transferred to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2011.

Continue Reading

Trending