Connect with us

Karnataka

2C, 2D reservation for Lingayat Panchmasali: High Court clears interim order, big relief for Govt.

Bengaluru : The High Court on Thursday vacated the interim order given to Lingayat Panchamasali to maintain the status quo regarding 2C and 2D reservation, and the state government seems to have got a big relief from the order. A PIL was filed by DG Raghavendra asking that 2A reservation should not be given to […]

Published

on

2C, 2D reservation for Lingayat Panchmasali: High Court clears interim order, big relief for Govt.
(Representational Image)

Bengaluru : The High Court on Thursday vacated the interim order given to Lingayat Panchamasali to maintain the status quo regarding 2C and 2D reservation, and the state government seems to have got a big relief from the order.

A PIL was filed by DG Raghavendra asking that 2A reservation should not be given to the Lingayat Panchamasali community and that the state government should not encourage the individual demands submitted by any sub-caste, community tribes seeking modification of reservation category. The Chief Justice of the High Court, which had heard the petition, granted an interim stay.

In this background, the further processes of the decision taken by the government to add category 2A or to create category 2C, 2D regarding the allocation of reservation had come to a temporary halt.

Now the interim order has been set aside after the Central Government Solicitor assured the High Court that there will be no change in 2A reservation. Thus, there is no obstacle to give 2C, 2D reservation to Panchmasali community.

During the hearing, counsel for the government, the state government will be conducted without causing any trouble to Category 2A. Therefore, he requested that the earlier order should be vacated to maintain the status quo in the case.

Also, the government lawyer said that a written statement will be submitted in this regard by the end of the day. Responding to this, the bench made it clear that all actions taken by the government in the case will be subject to the final decision of the court on this petition.

During the earlier hearing of the petition, the state government, which had objected to the petition requesting the community to provide reservation under the backward classes, asserted that it has the authority to revise the reservation list of backward classes every ten years.

Also, as per Section 9 of the Karnataka State Commission for Backward Classes Act-1995, if any community submits a petition for inclusion in the Backward Classes, the State Standing Commission for Backward Classes is allowed to review it. According to the rules, the commission has to conduct inquiry/survey/inquiry whether the requested communities are socially and educationally backward and recommend to the government about the classification of citizens as backward classes. Also, as per Section 11 of the Act, the State Government in consultation with the Commission may revise the list of Backward Classes every ten years. In this way, the request submitted by each community will be considered by the Sadashiva Commission. In the objection, the government has explained that this is also a continuous process.

The commission has also made several recommendations to the government from time to time and accordingly the government has classified and reclassified many backward classes. The social status of any backward class person is not the same. It is stated in the objection that a person belonging to the most backward category may be transferred to an advanced category in future.

The Lingayat Panchamasali community has sought reservation by adding it to the list of backward classes. The commission has reviewed the matter and submitted an interim report to the government. The government has already submitted it to the High Court in a sealed envelope.

The petitioner’s action in filing this petition is untimely. There is no public interest in the application. Therefore, the government has requested the court in its objection that the petition has no merit and deserves to be dismissed.

Karnataka

DGP Ramachandra Rao Under Investigation Over Actress Ranya Rao’s Shocking Airport Protocol Breach

The Karnataka government has initiated an research into the alleged misuse of protocol by actress Ranya Rao at Bengaluru’s Kempegowda International Airport (KIA). The probe also examines the potential involvement of Director General of Police (DGP) Ramachandra Rao in facilitating her unauthorized get admission to to a limited vicinity. Incident Overview On March 10, 2025, […]

Published

on

DGP Ramachandra Rao Under Investigation Over Actress Ranya Rao’s Shocking Airport Protocol Breach

The Karnataka government has initiated an research into the alleged misuse of protocol by actress Ranya Rao at Bengaluru’s Kempegowda International Airport (KIA). The probe also examines the potential involvement of Director General of Police (DGP) Ramachandra Rao in facilitating her unauthorized get admission to to a limited vicinity.

Incident Overview

On March 10, 2025, Ranya Rao reportedly bypassed standard security tactics at KIA, getting into through a VIP gate usually reserved for high-ranking officials and dignitaries. This breach has raised issues approximately security protocols and feasible misuse of official privileges.

Government’s Response

In reaction to the incident, the Karnataka Home Department has ordered a comprehensive research to determine:

How Rao received get entry to to the constrained region.

Whether DGP Ramachandra Rao played a role in facilitating this get entry to.

If there has been any breach of protection protocols or misuse of reputable privileges.

Official Statements

Karnataka‘s Home Minister stated, “We have taken severe note of the incident and directed an intensive investigation. Appropriate motion might be taken primarily based on the findings.”

Implications and Public Concern

This incident has sparked public challenge regarding:

Security Integrity: Ensuring that airport security protocols are upheld with out exceptions.

Accountability: Holding officials responsible if discovered complicit in protocol breaches.

Transparency: Maintaining public agree with thru obvious investigative approaches.

The investigation committee is expected to:

Review CCTV photos from the airport.

Interview airport safety employees and officers.

Obtain statements from Ranya Rao and DGP Ramachandra Rao.

The findings will guide any disciplinary actions or policy revisions to prevent future occurrences.

Continue Reading

Karnataka

Karnataka CID Files Charge Sheet Against B S Yediyurappa in Molestation Case

Karnataka CID files charge sheet against former CM B S Yediyurappa in molestation case involving a minor, following a complaint by the victim’s mother.

Published

on

Karnataka CID Files Charge Sheet Against B S Yediyurappa in Molestation Case
File Photo: B S Yediyurappa

The Crime Investigation Department (CID) probing molestation charges against former Karnataka Chief Minister B S Yediyurappa has taken a significant step forward. On Thursday, the CID filed a charge sheet in the special court dealing with Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) cases. This development comes after the Sadashivanagar police registered a case of molestation in March this year against the BJP stalwart. Following the registration of the case, Karnataka Director General of Police Alok Mohan issued an order transferring the investigation to the CID.

The case originated from a complaint lodged by the mother of a 17-year-old girl. She alleged that Yediyurappa molested her daughter during a meeting on February 2nd this year at his residence in Dollars Colony, Bangalore. The allegations have stirred significant controversy, with Yediyurappa vehemently denying the charges. He stated, “People would teach a lesson to those indulging in conspiracies against me,” signaling his intent to fight the accusations.

Tragically, the 54-year-old woman who filed the complaint passed away last month in a private hospital due to lung cancer. Despite her passing, the case has continued to progress under the scrutiny of the CID. On June 17, Yediyurappa was questioned by the CID for approximately three hours in connection with the case. This interrogation marks a critical phase in the investigation as the CID compiles evidence and testimonies to support the charges against the former Chief Minister.

Adding to the complexity of the situation, the Karnataka High Court had previously issued orders restraining the CID from arresting Yediyurappa. This order provides temporary relief to the former Chief Minister, allowing him to remain out of custody while the investigation continues. The high-profile nature of this case, involving a prominent political figure, has attracted significant public and media attention.

B S Yediyurappa

Yediyurappa, a veteran politician with a substantial following, has found himself at the center of this scandal. His denial of the charges and assertion of a conspiracy against him have fueled a narrative of political intrigue and manipulation. Supporters of Yediyurappa view the charges as an attempt to tarnish his reputation and undermine his political standing. On the other hand, detractors argue that the law must take its course, and justice should be served, irrespective of the accused’s political stature.

The CID’s charge sheet filing is a procedural step that indicates the completion of their preliminary investigation. It suggests that the agency believes there is sufficient evidence to proceed with prosecuting Yediyurappa. The special court handling POCSO cases will now review the charge sheet and determine the subsequent legal proceedings. This case is expected to undergo rigorous scrutiny, given the involvement of a high-profile accused and the sensitive nature of the charges.

As the legal battle unfolds, it is likely to impact the political landscape in Karnataka. Yediyurappa’s supporters within the BJP and his broader political base will be closely monitoring the proceedings. The outcome of this case could influence public opinion and potentially alter the dynamics within the party. Conversely, opposition parties may leverage the case to question the BJP’s moral standing and governance.

The allegations against Yediyurappa and the subsequent legal proceedings highlight the broader issue of accountability and transparency in public office. Cases involving accusations of sexual misconduct and abuse of power are critical in shaping public trust in political leaders and institutions. The legal system’s handling of this case will be indicative of its commitment to justice and the rule of law, irrespective of an individual’s social or political standing.

In conclusion, the filing of the charge sheet against B S Yediyurappa by the CID marks a pivotal moment in this high-profile molestation case. The legal proceedings that follow will be closely watched, not only for their judicial outcomes but also for their broader implications on Karnataka’s political landscape. Yediyurappa’s steadfast denial and claims of a conspiracy add layers of complexity to an already intricate case. As the special court examines the charge sheet and moves forward with the trial, the pursuit of justice remains paramount, serving as a reminder of the principles that underpin a fair and democratic society.

Continue Reading

india

MLC Suraj Revanna Arrested for Sexual Abuse, Remanded for 14 Days

MLC Suraj Revanna has been arrested on charges of sexually abusing a 27-year-old man in Hassan.

Published

on

MLC Suraj Revanna Arrested for Sexual Abuse, Remanded for 14 Days
Photo | videograb

MLC Suraj Revanna, a member of the Janata Dal (Secular) party, has been arrested following allegations of sexually abusing a 27-year-old man in Hassan district. The incident, which has shocked the local community, has drawn widespread media attention due to the high-profile nature of the accused, who is the grandson of former Prime Minister H D Deve Gowda. The case has now been handed over to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) for further investigation.

MLC Suraj Revanna

The arrest followed a complaint lodged by the victim, a young man from Arkalgud taluk in Hassan district. The victim alleged that Suraj Revanna, the eldest son of Holenarasipura MLA H D Revanna, sexually abused him at his farmhouse in Ghannikada on June 16. According to the complaint, Suraj promised the young man a job as a way to lure him to the farmhouse, where the alleged abuse took place. The victim reported the incident to the Holenarasipura police, who registered a case under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including Section 377 (unnatural offences), Section 342 (wrongful confinement), and Section 506 (criminal intimidation).

Following the registration of the complaint, Suraj Revanna was apprehended and initially held in Hassan. However, the investigation was quickly transferred to the CID, a move that is often made in high-profile cases to ensure a thorough and impartial investigation. Suraj was then transferred to Bengaluru, where he was produced before the 42nd Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court (ACMM) judge at the judge’s residence. The magistrate remanded Suraj in judicial custody for 14 days.

Suraj Revanna has vehemently denied the allegations against him, claiming that the complaint is part of an extortion attempt. He has accused the victim of filing a false complaint in an effort to extort Rs 5 crore from him. This counter-claim has added another layer of complexity to the case, as it suggests that there may be more at play than initially meets the eye.

The allegations against Suraj have sent shockwaves through the political community, particularly within the Janata Dal (Secular) party. As a prominent political figure and the grandson of a former Prime Minister, Suraj’s arrest has garnered significant media coverage. The case also highlights the ongoing issues of power dynamics and abuse within Indian politics, a subject that has been the focus of much public and media scrutiny in recent years.

The judicial proceedings and the CID’s investigation will be closely watched by the public and media alike. Cases involving high-profile individuals often attract intense scrutiny, not only because of the individuals involved but also because of the broader implications for justice and accountability within the political system. The outcome of this case could have significant repercussions, both for Suraj Revanna personally and for the political landscape in Karnataka.

As the case progresses, it is essential to ensure that the investigation is conducted impartially and that all parties involved are given a fair hearing. The CID’s involvement is a positive step in this direction, as it brings a level of expertise and impartiality that is crucial in high-stakes cases such as this. Additionally, it is vital for the judicial system to uphold the principles of justice and ensure that any decision made is based on a thorough and fair examination of the evidence.

The allegations against Suraj Revanna are serious and have the potential to significantly impact his political career and personal life. For now, he remains in judicial custody, and the CID’s investigation continues. The coming weeks will be critical in determining the course of this case and its eventual outcome.

Continue Reading

Trending