Connect with us

Karnataka

Karnataka CID Files Charge Sheet Against B S Yediyurappa in Molestation Case

Karnataka CID files charge sheet against former CM B S Yediyurappa in molestation case involving a minor, following a complaint by the victim’s mother.

Published

on

Karnataka CID Files Charge Sheet Against B S Yediyurappa in Molestation Case
File Photo: B S Yediyurappa

The Crime Investigation Department (CID) probing molestation charges against former Karnataka Chief Minister B S Yediyurappa has taken a significant step forward. On Thursday, the CID filed a charge sheet in the special court dealing with Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) cases. This development comes after the Sadashivanagar police registered a case of molestation in March this year against the BJP stalwart. Following the registration of the case, Karnataka Director General of Police Alok Mohan issued an order transferring the investigation to the CID.

The case originated from a complaint lodged by the mother of a 17-year-old girl. She alleged that Yediyurappa molested her daughter during a meeting on February 2nd this year at his residence in Dollars Colony, Bangalore. The allegations have stirred significant controversy, with Yediyurappa vehemently denying the charges. He stated, “People would teach a lesson to those indulging in conspiracies against me,” signaling his intent to fight the accusations.

Tragically, the 54-year-old woman who filed the complaint passed away last month in a private hospital due to lung cancer. Despite her passing, the case has continued to progress under the scrutiny of the CID. On June 17, Yediyurappa was questioned by the CID for approximately three hours in connection with the case. This interrogation marks a critical phase in the investigation as the CID compiles evidence and testimonies to support the charges against the former Chief Minister.

Adding to the complexity of the situation, the Karnataka High Court had previously issued orders restraining the CID from arresting Yediyurappa. This order provides temporary relief to the former Chief Minister, allowing him to remain out of custody while the investigation continues. The high-profile nature of this case, involving a prominent political figure, has attracted significant public and media attention.

B S Yediyurappa

Yediyurappa, a veteran politician with a substantial following, has found himself at the center of this scandal. His denial of the charges and assertion of a conspiracy against him have fueled a narrative of political intrigue and manipulation. Supporters of Yediyurappa view the charges as an attempt to tarnish his reputation and undermine his political standing. On the other hand, detractors argue that the law must take its course, and justice should be served, irrespective of the accused’s political stature.

The CID’s charge sheet filing is a procedural step that indicates the completion of their preliminary investigation. It suggests that the agency believes there is sufficient evidence to proceed with prosecuting Yediyurappa. The special court handling POCSO cases will now review the charge sheet and determine the subsequent legal proceedings. This case is expected to undergo rigorous scrutiny, given the involvement of a high-profile accused and the sensitive nature of the charges.

As the legal battle unfolds, it is likely to impact the political landscape in Karnataka. Yediyurappa’s supporters within the BJP and his broader political base will be closely monitoring the proceedings. The outcome of this case could influence public opinion and potentially alter the dynamics within the party. Conversely, opposition parties may leverage the case to question the BJP’s moral standing and governance.

The allegations against Yediyurappa and the subsequent legal proceedings highlight the broader issue of accountability and transparency in public office. Cases involving accusations of sexual misconduct and abuse of power are critical in shaping public trust in political leaders and institutions. The legal system’s handling of this case will be indicative of its commitment to justice and the rule of law, irrespective of an individual’s social or political standing.

In conclusion, the filing of the charge sheet against B S Yediyurappa by the CID marks a pivotal moment in this high-profile molestation case. The legal proceedings that follow will be closely watched, not only for their judicial outcomes but also for their broader implications on Karnataka’s political landscape. Yediyurappa’s steadfast denial and claims of a conspiracy add layers of complexity to an already intricate case. As the special court examines the charge sheet and moves forward with the trial, the pursuit of justice remains paramount, serving as a reminder of the principles that underpin a fair and democratic society.

Karnataka

Karnataka BJP Kicks Off Overnight Protest Against Price Hikes and Muslim Quota

Led by BJP’s state president Vijayendra, the demonstration targets the Congress-led government’s recent price hikes and its controversial decision to introduce a 4% reservation for Muslims […]

Published

on

Karnataka BJP Kicks Off Overnight Protest Against Price Hikes and Muslim Quota
Photo Kind courtesy : IANS X

Bengaluru, Karnataka: The political air in Karnataka is buzzing as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) launched an overnight protest at Freedom Park in Bengaluru on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. Led by state president BY Vijayendra, the demonstration targets the Congress-led government’s recent price hikes and its controversial decision to introduce a 4% reservation for Muslims in government contracts. With emotions running high, this protest marks a bold stand against what the BJP calls a “burden on the people.”

The protest kicked off at 11 a.m. and stretched into the night, with Vijayendra slamming the Siddaramaiah government for making life tougher for everyday citizens. He pointed to the recent Rs 4 increase in Nandini milk prices—now the third hike since Congress took charge—as an “Ugadi gift” that’s left families struggling. “This government promised relief but delivered only rising costs,” Vijayendra said, vowing to keep the pressure on until the hikes are rolled back.

A Fight Against Rising Costs and Policy Shifts

The BJP isn’t stopping at milk prices. Vijayendra accused the government of jacking up water tariffs, petrol costs, and more, hitting the poor and farmers the hardest. He also took aim at the 4% quota for Muslims in public contracts, labeling it “unconstitutional” and a move that sidelines other backward classes like SCs, STs, and OBCs. “This isn’t about fairness—it’s about appeasement politics,” he argued, promising a statewide awareness campaign starting April 10 to rally public support.

The protest saw a strong turnout, with BJP MLAs, MLCs, former legislators, and district leaders joining in. Vijayendra stressed that this is just the beginning, with plans for demonstrations across all district centers on April 4 and taluk-level protests on April 5. “We’re here to fight for the people, not just make noise,” he added, urging the government to rethink its policies.

A Divided Response

While the BJP rallies its base, the Congress government defends its actions. The milk price hike, they say, supports dairy farmers by covering rising production costs, with Karnataka Milk Federation (KMF) Chairman Bheema Naik noting that prices here are still lower than in states like Gujarat or Delhi. On the Muslim quota, the government insists it’s based on socio-economic backwardness, not religion, aligning with long-standing policies under previous administrations.

Yet, the BJP remains unconvinced, accusing Congress of playing the minority card to win votes. The tension spilled into the streets of Bengaluru, with protesters chanting slogans and holding signs, creating a lively yet tense atmosphere. Police kept a close watch, ensuring the demonstration stayed peaceful as traffic flowed nearby and shops stayed open.

What’s Next for Karnataka?

This overnight protest is more than a one-night stand—it’s a signal of bigger battles ahead. With the BJP gearing up for a statewide movement, and the Congress digging in, Karnataka’s political scene is heating up. Residents are left wondering: Will the government back down, or will this spark a longer fight? For now, the focus is on Freedom Park, where voices of dissent echo into the early morning.

Stay tuned as this story develops. Whether it’s about your grocery bill or community rights, this protest could shape Karnataka’s future. Keep checking for the latest updates on price hikes, Muslim quota debates, and more!

Continue Reading

Karnataka

VHP Appeals to Karnataka Governor to Reject Bill Granting 4% Quota for Muslims

Debate Intensifies Over Religion-Based Reservations in Karnataka’s Public Contracts The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) has formally requested Karnataka Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot to withhold approval of the recently passed Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements (Amendment) Bill, 2025. This legislation aims to reserve 4% of public contracts for Muslim contractors, specifically allocating quotas for civil works up […]

Published

on

VHP Appeals to Karnataka Governor to Reject Bill Granting 4% Quota for Muslims
(Photo Courtesy ANI)

Debate Intensifies Over Religion-Based Reservations in Karnataka’s Public Contracts

The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) has formally requested Karnataka Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot to withhold approval of the recently passed Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement (Amendment) Bill, 2025. This legislation aims to reserve 4% of public contracts for Muslim contractors, specifically allocating quotas for civil works up to ₹2 crore and goods and services contracts up to ₹1 crore.

In their memorandum, the VHP contends that the bill contravenes constitutional principles by introducing reservations based on religion. They highlight that Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the chief architect of the Indian Constitution, opposed religion-based reservations, emphasizing that Article 15 prohibits the state from discriminating among citizens on grounds of religion or caste.

The organization further references previous judicial decisions where courts, including the Supreme Court, have invalidated similar attempts at religion-based reservations in other states. They argue that implementing such quotas poses a threat to national integrity, unity, and sovereignty, accusing the Karnataka government of engaging in vote-bank politics.

This development follows the passage of the bill in the Karnataka Legislative Assembly amid significant opposition and controversy. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has also voiced strong objections, labeling the move as unconstitutional and vowing to challenge it legally.

Continue Reading

Karnataka

Shocking Karnataka Honey Trap Scandal: Supreme Court Rejects CBI Probe Plea

Political Drama Unfolds as KN Rajanna’s Claims Stir Controversy

Published

on

Shocking Karnataka Honey Trap Scandal: Supreme Court Rejects CBI Probe Plea
This image is for representational purposes only

Political Drama on Honey Trap Unfolds as KN Rajanna’s Claims Stir Controversy

In a dramatic turn of events, the Supreme Court shut down a bold request for a CBI or SIT investigation into Karnataka’s alleged honey trap saga on March 26, 2025, leaving political circles buzzing and everyday folks scratching their heads.

The public interest litigation (PIL), filed by Jharkhand resident Binay Kumar Singh, aimed to dig deeper into explosive claims made by Karnataka Cooperation Minister KN Rajanna. He’d alleged that 48 politicians—including big names from both state and national levels—had been ensnared in a web of scandal involving compromising videos. But the court wasn’t having it, dismissing the plea as “political nonsense” and questioning why it even landed on their desk.

The whole mess kicked off when Rajanna dropped his bombshell on the floor of the Karnataka Assembly, hinting at a sprawling honey trap network that didn’t care about party lines—Congress, BJP, you name it.

Singh’s PIL painted a dire picture, suggesting this wasn’t just gossip but a serious threat to justice, especially with whispers that judges might be tangled up too. He begged for an independent probe, free from Karnataka’s influence, overseen by either the Supreme Court or a retired judge. Yet, the bench—led by Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol, and Sandeep Mehta—brushed it off, saying, “We’ve got bigger fish to fry.”

Rajanna himself tried to clear the air, insisting he never pointed fingers at judges. “It’s all about political rivals slinging mud—nothing more,” he told reporters, hinting the PIL twisted his words for drama. Meanwhile, Karnataka’s Home Minister G Parameshwara didn’t sit idle. After Rajanna handed over a three-page complaint about his own honey trap close call, Parameshwara promised a high-level state investigation. “This isn’t just about one guy—it’s about dignity for all of us in the Assembly,” he said, vowing to get to the bottom of it.

The opposition BJP wasn’t about to let this slide either. They turned the Assembly into a shouting match, waving CDs and demanding a judicial probe, only to see 18 of their MLAs suspended for six months after the chaos. Former CM Basavaraj Bommai didn’t mince words, slamming the state’s “criminal cabinet” and saying Karnataka’s reputation is taking a beating nationwide.

For regular folks watching from the sidelines, it’s a mix of shock and skepticism. “Politicians caught in scandals? Sounds like a Tuesday,” one Bengaluru resident quipped. Others wonder if the truth will ever come out without a neutral agency like the CBI stepping in. With the Supreme Court washing its hands of the matter, all eyes are on Karnataka’s next move. Will Parameshwara’s probe deliver answers, or is this just another chapter in the state’s wild political soap opera? Stay tuned—this one’s far from over. What do you think—conspiracy or just dirty politics? Let us know!

Continue Reading

Trending