Connect with us

India

Possessing and Transporting Cattle Within UP Not a Violation of Cow Slaughter Act: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that mere possession and transportation of cattle within the state of Uttar Pradesh will not be considered an offence under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act.

Published

on

Possessing and Transporting Cattle Within UP Not a Violation of Cow Slaughter Act: Allahabad High Court
(indianexpress: Photo)

Lucknow: The Allahabad High Court has ruled that mere possession and transportation of cattle within the state of Uttar Pradesh will not be considered an offence under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The court made this observation while hearing the bail application of Kundan Yadav, who had been arrested and detained for nearly three months after six cows, showing no signs of physical injury, were found in a vehicle owned by him. Yadav was charged with offences under the UP Cow Slaughter Act-1955 and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

In its ruling granting bail to Kundan Yadav, the court emphasized that the mere possession of live cows or bullocks does not amount to committing, abetting, or attempting an offence under the Cow Slaughter Act. Furthermore, the transportation of cows within Uttar Pradesh does not fall within the scope of the aforementioned Act. Therefore, the act of transporting cows within the state of UP cannot be considered as committing, abetting, or attempting to commit an offence under the said Act.

The Judge stated, “No material or circumstance has been presented by the state counsel to demonstrate that any physical injury was inflicted on any cow or its progeny, endangering their lives, such as mutilating their bodies or transporting them in a manner that endangers their lives.”

The court further added that the state counsel failed to provide evidence that the applicant had slaughtered or intended to slaughter a cow, bull, or bullock anywhere in Uttar Pradesh. Consequently, the alleged act of the applicant does not fall under the purview of the UP Cow Slaughter Act.

While granting bail, the court concluded that there was no intention on the part of Kundan Yadav to endanger the lives of cows by withholding food or water. It also noted the absence of witnesses or reports from competent authorities demonstrating that the applicant had caused any physical injury to a cow or bullock.

Notably, a few days prior to this ruling, the Allahabad High Court had made a similar observation regarding the recovery and possession of meat. The court stated that possessing meat would not be a punishable offence under the same Act unless it could be proven that it was beef or a beef product.

This ruling by the Allahabad High Court brings clarity to the issue of possessing and transporting cattle within Uttar Pradesh and highlights the need for substantial evidence to establish offences under the Cow Slaughter Act.

India

YSRTP-Congress Merger Decision by End of September: Sharmila

YS Sharmila, YSR Telangana Party founder, met party members to plan for upcoming state Assembly polls and will tour all segments from October.

Published

on

YSRTP-Congress Merger Decision by End of September: Sharmila
Photo: Y.S. Sharmila

Hyderabad: YSR Telangana Party Founder, Y.S. Sharmila, has announced that a decision regarding potential collaboration with the Congress will be reached by the conclusion of this month. Sharmila, who is the sister of Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, conducted a meeting with senior party officials and members to deliberate on various aspects related to the forthcoming Telangana State Assembly elections, as stated in a press release.

During the meeting, the YSR Telangana Party leader emphasized that the determination regarding cooperation with the Congress would be finalized by the end of September, given the rapidly approaching notification deadline for the assembly polls. In the event that no alliance is forged, the party will proceed to contest in all 119 constituencies, according to the release.

Additionally, Sharmila disclosed plans to embark on a tour of all assembly segments commencing in the second week of October. In today’s meeting, she assured party workers that their contributions would be duly acknowledged, and their interests would be safeguarded, as outlined in the release.

There had been speculation that Sharmila would formally engage with AICC leaders during the recent Congress Working Committee meeting held a few days ago. She had previously indicated that her discussions with the Congress party concerning potential collaboration or merger had entered their final stages. Furthermore, Sharmila had met with Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi in the national capital as part of these discussions.

Continue Reading

India

Pragya Thakur Presents Herself in Court for 2008 Malegaon Blast Case

BJP MP Pragya Thakur appears in court for 2008 Malegaon blast case, citing health reasons for her late arrival.

Published

on

Pragya Thakur Presents Herself in Court for 2008 Malegaon Blast Case
File photo: BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur. | IANS

Mumbai: Bharatiya Janata Party MP Pragya Singh Thakur, one of the accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, made her appearance in a special NIA court in Mumbai on Monday. Thakur arrived at the court around 2 pm, a couple of hours after the other accused in the case had already presented themselves.

During her court appearance, Thakur cited health issues as the reason for her delayed arrival, explaining that it hindered her ability to wake up early in the morning. As a result of this, the court decided to adjourn the proceedings to October 3, when they would record the statements of all the accused involved.

On September 14, the prosecution had informed the court that the process of collecting evidence for the case had been completed, and there was no need for further examination of prosecution witnesses. Following this, the court typically proceeds to record the statements of the accused under section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). In this stage, the court poses general questions to the accused, allowing them to personally address any circumstances that may have arisen from the evidence presented against them.

On this particular day, only six of the accused appeared before the court: Pragya Singh Thakur, Lt Col Prasad Purohit, Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, and Sameer Kulkarni. Sudhakar Dwivedi was notably absent, and his lawyer attributed his absence to religious rituals. However, the court rejected this explanation and issued a bailable warrant of Rs 5,000 against Dwivedi.

The Malegaon blast case dates back to September 29, 2008, when an explosive device attached to a motorcycle detonated near a mosque in Malegaon, a town approximately 200 km from Mumbai in northern Maharashtra. The incident resulted in six fatalities and over 100 individuals sustaining injuries. Initially, the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) handled the investigation, but it was later transferred to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2011.

Continue Reading

India

Bridge Collapse in Surendranagar Gujarat; four injured

Bridge collapse: 40-ton dumper crosses banned bridge on Panchayat road near Wadhwan city, raising safety concerns. Learn more.

Published

on

Bridge Collapse in Surendranagar Gujarat; four injured
S Grab:-Twitter/@Kshatriyadilip

In a concerning incident in Gujarat’s Surendranagar district, an old bridge over the Bhogavo river collapsed, resulting in injuries to four individuals. The incident transpired on a Sunday evening when a 40-ton dumper attempted to cross the bridge, despite heavy vehicle restrictions on the panchayat road near Wadhwan city. This article delves into the details of this bridge collapse and the circumstances leading up to it.

The Bridge Collapse

The collapse of the bridge occurred suddenly, sending shockwaves through the local community. A dumper, along with two motorcycles, was traversing the bridge when the first slab gave way, causing minor injuries to the four people on it. The heavy vehicle and motorcycles plunged into the Bhogavo river, leading to a chaotic and dangerous situation.

Age and Responsibility

This bridge, now making headlines for all the wrong reasons, had a significant history. It had been serving the community for almost four decades, with the responsibility for its maintenance lying with the state Road and Buildings Department. Despite its age, the bridge was considered safe, but recent events have brought its structural integrity into question.

Warning Signs Ignored

It’s worth noting that authorities had taken precautions to prevent such incidents. A warning board was prominently displayed, and barricades were erected to deter heavy vehicles from using the bridge. These measures were taken to ensure the safety of all road users. However, despite these clear warnings and restrictions, a 40-ton dumper ventured onto the bridge, ultimately leading to the collapse of its first slab.

The Aftermath

The aftermath of the bridge collapse has raised important questions about infrastructure maintenance and adherence to safety guidelines. Local authorities are currently assessing the situation, and investigations are underway to determine the exact cause of the collapse. Meanwhile, the injured individuals are receiving medical attention, and efforts are being made to retrieve the vehicles from the Bhogavo river.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the collapse of the bridge in Surendranagar is a stark reminder of the importance of adhering to safety regulations and guidelines. It is imperative that both authorities and citizens exercise caution when using aging infrastructure. This incident highlights the need for proactive maintenance and strict enforcement of vehicle restrictions on such bridges to prevent similar tragedies in the future.

Continue Reading

Trending