Connect with us

India

UP Police: Tripta Tyagi Faces Juvenile Justice Act

UP Police invokes Juvenile Justice Act in FIR against Tripta Tyagi for student assault

Published

on

UP Police: Tripta Tyagi Faces Juvenile Justice Act
(Twitter Video: screen grab)

Agra: the Uttar Pradesh Police has recently incorporated Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act into the FIR filed against Tripta Tyagi, a school teacher who stands accused of instructing her students to slap a fellow Muslim classmate due to his failure to complete his homework. This development has far-reaching implications not only for the accused but also for the broader context of child protection and justice in India.

Understanding Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act

Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act is a pivotal piece of legislation that addresses situations where a person in charge of a child engages in activities that harm or neglect the child in any way. These activities may include physical abuse, abandonment, mistreatment, or willful neglect. The inclusion of this section in the FIR against Tripta Tyagi underscores the seriousness of the allegations against her.

Penalties Under Section 75

The Juvenile Justice Act lays down stringent penalties for those found guilty under Section 75. Offenders may face a rigorous imprisonment term ranging from three to ten years, in addition to a substantial fine of Rs 5 lakh. These penalties are designed to serve as a deterrent against any form of child abuse or neglect, emphasizing the government’s commitment to safeguarding the rights and well-being of children.

Background of the Case

The case against Tripta Tyagi was initially registered on August 26 following a complaint filed by the boy’s family. The charges against her at that time included sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke a breach of the peace) of the Indian Penal Code. These charges were classified as non-cognizable offenses.

However, as the investigation progressed, Circle Officer Ravi Shankar confirmed the inclusion of Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act in the FIR against the schoolteacher. This decision underscores the gravity of the situation and the need to ensure that justice prevails in cases involving the mistreatment of children.

The Viral Video That Sparked Outrage

The turning point in this case occurred on August 25 when a viral video began circulating widely. The video depicted Tripta Tyagi instructing her students to slap a second-grade boy at Neha Public School in Khubbapur village, Muzaffarnagar district. What made matters worse was that during the incident, Tyagi also made a communal remark, further intensifying the outrage.

Public and Political Reaction

The video, with its disturbing content, triggered strong reactions from various quarters. Political leaders across the spectrum expressed their condemnation of the incident, calling for strict action against the accused teacher. Additionally, the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), the apex body responsible for safeguarding the rights of children in India, swiftly responded by demanding punitive measures against Tripta Tyagi.

Tripta Tyagi’s Defense

In her defense, Tripta Tyagi claimed that the video had been manipulated to incite tensions. She argued that it was recorded by the boy’s uncle and maintained that her actions were a result of her physical handicap, which prevented her from reaching the student who had not completed his assignment.

The Broader Implications

The case of Tripta Tyagi highlights the critical role of the legal framework in safeguarding the rights of children. The inclusion of Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act in the FIR is indicative of a commitment to ensuring that no child in India faces physical abuse, mistreatment, or neglect at the hands of those responsible for their care.

It also serves as a stark reminder that in today’s digital age, incidents of child abuse or misconduct can quickly become public knowledge, leading to widespread outrage and calls for justice. The response from the NCPCR and political leaders underscores the collective responsibility to protect the most vulnerable members of society.

Conclusion

Incorporating Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act into the FIR against Tripta Tyagi is a significant step towards addressing the alleged mistreatment of a young student. It sends a clear message that child abuse and neglect will not be tolerated, and those responsible will face the full force of the law.

As this case unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the importance of safeguarding the rights and well-being of children across India. The government, law enforcement agencies, and society at large must work together to ensure that children are protected from harm and that justice prevails.

Karnataka

HD Deve Gowda Warns Grandson Prajwal Revanna to Return Amid SIT Investigation

Former PM HD Deve Gowda demands his grandson, MP Prajwal Revanna, wanted by SIT over sexual abuse charges, return from abroad to face justice.

Published

on

HD Deve Gowda Warns Grandson Prajwal Revanna to Return Amid SIT Investigation
(File Photo : economictimes)

Former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda issued a stern warning to his grandson, Hassan JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna, who is wanted by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) over sexual abuse charges, to return from abroad immediately. The warning was delivered through a letter posted on X, wherein Gowda emphasized the importance of regaining public trust, which has supported him for over six decades.

Prajwal Revanna left for Germany on April 26 after voting in the Lok Sabha polls. Following the sexual abuse charges against him, Karnataka’s political landscape was shaken, prompting the state government to establish the SIT and secure an Interpol blue corner alert to track him down.

Gowda’s public reprimand came after Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to cancel Prajwal’s diplomatic passport. Days earlier, former Chief Minister HD Kumaraswamy, Prajwal’s uncle, expressed ignorance about his nephew’s whereabouts and appealed for his return through the media.

On his 91st birthday on May 18, Gowda broke his silence, expressing no objection to legal action against Prajwal. He alleged that the Congress government fabricated cases against his son, HD Revanna, Prajwal’s father, who serves as Holenarasipura MLA. Revanna faced arrest over the alleged kidnapping of Prajwal’s victim but was released on bail.

In his letter, Gowda recounted the emotional turmoil caused by the allegations against Prajwal. He described his shock and pain, stating that he supported the harshest legal penalties if Prajwal is found guilty. He acknowledged the severe criticism directed at his family and refrained from countering the public’s harsh words, asserting his commitment to truth and conscience.

Gowda insisted he had no prior knowledge of Prajwal’s activities or his foreign trip, emphasizing his faith in divine justice. He avoided commenting on political conspiracies or falsehoods, trusting that those responsible would eventually face divine retribution.

Gowda concluded his letter with a definitive warning: Prajwal must return and submit to the legal process. This was not a mere appeal but a direct order, with severe familial and legal consequences for non-compliance. Gowda stressed that neither he nor his family would interfere with the investigation, underscoring the paramount importance of justice for the victims of Prajwal’s alleged actions.

Gowda’s firm stance highlights his dedication to maintaining integrity and justice, reflecting his deep commitment to the principles he has upheld throughout his extensive political career. The former Prime Minister’s demand for Prajwal’s return and accountability underlines a significant moment in Karnataka’s political and judicial landscape.

Continue Reading

Mangaluru

High Drama at Belthangady MLA Harish Poonja’s Residence Amid Police Inquiry

Tension escalated at MLA Harish Poonja’s residence in Belthangady as police visited for inquiry, leading to protests and high drama involving party workers.

Published

on

High Drama at Belthangady MLA Harish Poonja’s Residence Amid Police Inquiry
(Photo: X/@HateDetectors)

The serene surroundings of Gardadi in Belthangady were disrupted on Wednesday as a tense standoff unfolded at the residence of Belthangady MLA Harish Poonja. The incident, rooted in ongoing legal inquiries and heightened by political activism, culminated in a dramatic day marked by police presence, political rallies, and fervent exchanges.

Police Inquiry Sparks Tension

The episode began with the arrival of a police team at MLA Harish Poonja’s residence. This visit was part of an ongoing investigation related to a case filed against the MLA. According to Dakshina Kannada (DK) SP Ryshyanth C B, the MLA had been summoned for an inquiry but had initially declined to attend, leading to police intervention at his home.

SP Ryshyanth emphasized, “We have served a notice in the morning and received a copy of the notice issued. Despite this, there was a lack of cooperation until the evening, but the MLA’s representatives have now agreed to attend the inquiry.”

Political Showdown

As news of the police presence spread, a large number of party workers and prominent political figures, including DK MP Nalin Kumar Kateel, MLA D Vedavyas Kamath, and others, gathered at the MLA’s residence. The scene quickly turned confrontational as party workers engaged in heated exchanges with the police, chanting slogans like “Bharath Mata ki jai” and voicing their discontent against the Congress-led government.

Amid the rising tensions, additional police personnel were deployed to manage the crowd and maintain order. Advocate K Shambhu Sharma clarified that the police were there in connection with a case filed against the MLA, emphasizing the need for proper notice as per Supreme Court guidelines.

Allegations and Legal Battles

The legal troubles for MLA Harish Poonja stem from multiple incidents. The primary case involves allegations of the MLA pressuring a station officer to release BJP Yuva Morcha Mandala President Shashiraj, who was arrested for illegal quarrying and stocking explosives. Consequently, the MLA was booked under IPC Sections 353 and 504.

The situation escalated further when another case was registered against the MLA. This second case was related to a protest organized without prior permission in front of the Vikasa Soudha in Belthangady. During the protest, the MLA allegedly made provocative remarks against the police and hinted at potential unrest similar to the DJ Halli and KJ Halli incidents in Bengaluru. This led to charges under IPC Sections 143, 147, 341, 504, 506, and 149.

Political and Social Ramifications

The unfolding drama at MLA Harish Poonja’s residence highlights the intricate interplay between law enforcement and political activism in India. The incident has sparked a broader conversation about the responsibilities and conduct of elected officials, the legal processes involved, and the role of political supporters in such high-tension scenarios.

Political analysts suggest that such incidents could have significant implications for the upcoming elections, influencing public perception and voter behavior. The MLA’s actions and the response from law enforcement are likely to be scrutinized closely in the coming days.

Conclusion

The events at Gardadi on Wednesday are a stark reminder of the complexities inherent in the intersection of politics and law enforcement. As MLA Harish Poonja navigates the legal inquiries and the political fallout, the situation remains a focal point for both his supporters and detractors. The coming days will reveal the broader implications of this high-stakes drama in Belthangady.

As the investigations proceed and political maneuvers continue, the community and the state will be watching closely, anticipating the next developments in this unfolding saga.

Continue Reading

Karnataka

61 Terminated Safai Karmacharis Await Reinstatement from DRDO’s CABS

61 safai karmacharis terminated from DRDO’s CABS in March seek reinstatement and justice against contractor extortion.

Published

on

61 Terminated Safai Karmacharis Await Reinstatement from DRDO's CABS
(Representational Image)

In March 2024, 61 safai karmacharis, all women from marginalized communities, were terminated from their positions at the Centre for Airborne Systems (CABS), a part of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). This sudden termination has left these workers in a state of uncertainty and has raised significant concerns regarding workers’ rights, extortion by contractors, and the treatment of marginalized communities in India.

Background of the Termination

The termination of these workers did not happen in a vacuum. The safai karmacharis allege that their dismissal was a direct result of their decision to raise their voices against the injustice and extortion practices of their contractor. According to the workers, the contractor was demanding an illegal cut of Rs 4,200 from their monthly wages to release their salaries. When the workers, backed by the Karnataka General Labour Union, affiliated with the All India Central Council of Trade Unions, protested against this malpractice, they were relieved of their duties.

Role of the Regional Labour Commissioner

In 2023, the safai karmacharis had approached the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) to lodge a formal complaint about the extortion. The Labour Commissioner intervened, but the resolution was short-lived. On March 23, 2024, when the women reported for duty, they were informed of their termination. They were told that a new contractor, Indian Security Agency, had taken over, and their services were no longer required.

Demands and Actions by the Labour Union

The Karnataka General Labour Union has been at the forefront of this battle, demanding the immediate reinstatement of the terminated workers. They have also called for criminal and disciplinary action against the contractor for his illegal extortion practices. Additionally, the union is seeking a refund of the extorted amounts and demanding dignified working conditions for the safai karmacharis at CABS.

Agreement and Its Violation

In a meeting held on May 9, 2024, an agreement was reached between the commission for safai karmacharis and representatives of CABS to reinstate the terminated workers. However, despite this agreement, the workers have not been reinstated, leaving them in a precarious situation.

Working Conditions at CABS

The terminated workers have also raised concerns about the unhygienic working conditions at CABS. They report that they were not provided with adequate safety equipment, which is essential for their job. This neglect not only compromises their health and safety but also reflects a broader issue of disregard for the welfare of marginalized workers.

The Impact of Termination on Workers

The sudden termination has had a profound impact on the lives of these workers. Many of them are the primary breadwinners of their families, and the loss of income has led to financial distress. The psychological impact of losing their jobs under such unjust circumstances has also been significant.

Broader Implications for Workers’ Rights

This incident highlights broader issues concerning workers’ rights in India, particularly for those from marginalized communities. The exploitation of workers by contractors, the lack of accountability, and the failure to uphold agreements made with labor commissions are systemic problems that need urgent attention.

Call to Action

The Karnataka General Labour Union continues to press for the reinstatement of the 61 safai karmacharis. They are advocating for a system that ensures fair treatment, dignified working conditions, and strict actions against those who exploit workers. Their struggle is not just for their own reinstatement but for a broader change in how marginalized workers are treated in India.

Conclusion

The case of the 61 terminated safai karmacharis from DRDO’s CABS is a stark reminder of the ongoing struggles faced by marginalized workers in India. As they await justice, it is imperative for authorities to address their grievances, ensure their reinstatement, and take concrete steps to prevent such injustices in the future. The fight for their rights is a fight for a more equitable and just society where every worker is treated with dignity and respect.

Continue Reading

Trending